(reland) [clang] Warn [[clang::lifetimebound]] misusages on types (#118501)

This relands #118281 as-is, after it got reverted in commit
356df2d. The reland can go in after we
fixed some downstream codebases that had incorrectly placed attributes.

Original commit description:

> Emit the "cannot be applied to types" warning instead of silently
ignoring the attribute when it's attempted to be used on a type (instead
of a function argument or the function definition).
>
> Before this commit, the warning has been printed when the attribute
was (mis)used on a decl-specifier, but not in other places in a
declarator.
>
> Examples where the warning starts being emitted with this commit:
>
> ```
>   int * [[clang::lifetimebound]] x;
>
>   void f(int * [[clang::lifetimebound]] x);
>
>   void g(int * [[clang::lifetimebound]]);
> ```
>
> Note that the last example is the case of an unnamed function
parameter. While in theory Clang could've supported the
`[[clang::lifetimebound]]` analysis for unnamed parameters, it doesn't
currently, so the commit at least makes the situation better by
highlighting this as a warning instead of a silent ignore - which was
reported at #96034.

Author: emaxx-google

clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ C++ Specific Potentially Breaking Changes
     // Fixed version:
     unsigned operator""_udl_name(unsigned long long);
 
-- Clang will now produce an error diagnostic when [[clang::lifetimebound]] is
+- Clang will now produce an error diagnostic when ``[[clang::lifetimebound]]`` is
   applied on a parameter or an implicit object parameter of a function that
   returns void. This was previously ignored and had no effect. (#GH107556)
 
@@ -156,6 +156,21 @@ C++ Specific Potentially Breaking Changes
     // Now diagnoses with an error.
     void f(int& i [[clang::lifetimebound]]);
 
+- Clang will now produce an error diagnostic when ``[[clang::lifetimebound]]``
+  is applied on a type (instead of a function parameter or an implicit object
+  parameter); this includes the case when the attribute is specified for an
+  unnamed function parameter. These were previously ignored and had no effect.
+  (#GH118281)
+
+  .. code-block:: c++
+
+    // Now diagnoses with an error.
+    int* [[clang::lifetimebound]] x;
+    // Now diagnoses with an error.
+    void f(int* [[clang::lifetimebound]] i);
+    // Now diagnoses with an error.
+    void g(int* [[clang::lifetimebound]]);
+
 - Clang now rejects all field accesses on null pointers in constant expressions. The following code
   used to work but will now be rejected:
 

clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp

@@ -8628,7 +8628,11 @@ static void HandleLifetimeBoundAttr(TypeProcessingState &State,
     CurType = State.getAttributedType(
         createSimpleAttr<LifetimeBoundAttr>(State.getSema().Context, Attr),
         CurType, CurType);
+    return;
   }
+  State.getSema().Diag(Attr.getLoc(), diag::err_attribute_wrong_decl_type_str)
+      << Attr << Attr.isRegularKeywordAttribute()
+      << "parameters and implicit object parameters";
 }
 
 static void HandleLifetimeCaptureByAttr(TypeProcessingState &State,

clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-lifetimebound.cpp

@@ -9,11 +9,25 @@ namespace usage_invalid {
     ~A() [[clang::lifetimebound]]; // expected-error {{cannot be applied to a destructor}}
     static int *static_class_member() [[clang::lifetimebound]]; // expected-error {{static member function has no implicit object parameter}}
     int *explicit_object(this A&) [[clang::lifetimebound]]; // expected-error {{explicit object member function has no implicit object parameter}}
-    int not_function [[clang::lifetimebound]]; // expected-error {{only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
-    int [[clang::lifetimebound]] also_not_function; // expected-error {{cannot be applied to types}}
+    int attr_on_var [[clang::lifetimebound]]; // expected-error {{only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
+    int [[clang::lifetimebound]] attr_on_int; // expected-error {{cannot be applied to types}}
+    int * [[clang::lifetimebound]] attr_on_int_ptr; // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
+    int * [[clang::lifetimebound]] * attr_on_int_ptr_ptr; // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
+    int (* [[clang::lifetimebound]] attr_on_func_ptr)(); // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
     void void_return_member() [[clang::lifetimebound]]; // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute cannot be applied to an implicit object parameter of a function that returns void; did you mean 'lifetime_capture_by(X)'}}
   };
   int *attr_with_param(int &param [[clang::lifetimebound(42)]]); // expected-error {{takes no arguments}}
+
+  void attr_on_ptr_arg(int * [[clang::lifetimebound]] ptr); // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
+  static_assert((int [[clang::lifetimebound]]) 12); // expected-error {{cannot be applied to types}}
+  int* attr_on_unnamed_arg(const int& [[clang::lifetimebound]]); // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
+  template <typename T>
+  int* attr_on_template_ptr_arg(T * [[clang::lifetimebound]] ptr); // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
+
+  int (*func_ptr)(int) [[clang::lifetimebound]]; // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
+  int (*(*func_ptr_ptr)(int) [[clang::lifetimebound]])(int); // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
+  struct X {};
+  int (X::*member_func_ptr)(int) [[clang::lifetimebound]]; // expected-error {{'lifetimebound' attribute only applies to parameters and implicit object parameters}}
 }
 
 namespace usage_ok {