AMDGPU: Remove a pointless SIFunctionResourceInfo::getTotalNumVgprs o… (#101158)

…verload

Author: nhaehnle

llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis.cpp

@@ -85,14 +85,9 @@ int32_t AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis::SIFunctionResourceInfo::getTotalNumSGPRs(
                                    ST.getTargetID().isXnackOnOrAny());
 }
 
-int32_t AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis::SIFunctionResourceInfo::getTotalNumVGPRs(
-    const GCNSubtarget &ST, int32_t ArgNumAGPR, int32_t ArgNumVGPR) const {
-  return AMDGPU::getTotalNumVGPRs(ST.hasGFX90AInsts(), ArgNumAGPR, ArgNumVGPR);
-}
-
 int32_t AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis::SIFunctionResourceInfo::getTotalNumVGPRs(
     const GCNSubtarget &ST) const {
-  return getTotalNumVGPRs(ST, NumAGPR, NumVGPR);
+  return AMDGPU::getTotalNumVGPRs(ST.hasGFX90AInsts(), NumAGPR, NumVGPR);
 }
 
 bool AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis::runOnModule(Module &M) {

llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis.h

@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ struct AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis : public ModulePass {
     int32_t getTotalNumSGPRs(const GCNSubtarget &ST) const;
     // Total number of VGPRs is actually a combination of AGPR and VGPR
     // depending on architecture - and some alignment constraints
-    int32_t getTotalNumVGPRs(const GCNSubtarget &ST, int32_t NumAGPR,
-                             int32_t NumVGPR) const;
     int32_t getTotalNumVGPRs(const GCNSubtarget &ST) const;
   };