You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[Coroutines] ABI Objects to improve code separation between different ABIs, users and utilities. (#109713)
This patch re-lands #109338 and
fixes the various test failures.
--- Original description ---
* Adds an ABI object class hierarchy to implement the coroutine ABIs
(Switch, Asyc, and Retcon{Once})
* The ABI object improves the separation of the code related to users,
ABIs and utilities.
* No code changes are required by any existing users.
* Each ABI overrides delegate methods for initialization, building the
coroutine frame and splitting the coroutine, other methods may be added
later.
* CoroSplit invokes a generator lambda to instantiate the ABI object and
calls the ABI object to carry out its primary operations. In a follow-up
change this will be used to instantiated customized ABIs according to a
new intrinsic llvm.coro.begin.custom.abi.
* Note, in a follow-up change additional constructors will be added to
the ABI objects (Switch, Asyc, and AnyRetcon) to allow a set of
generator lambdas to be passed in from a CoroSplit constructor that will
also be added. The init() method is separate from the constructor to
avoid duplication of its code. It is a virtual method so it can be
invoked by CreateAndInitABI or potentially CoroSplit::run(). I wasn't
sure if we should call init() from within CoroSplit::run(),
CreateAndInitABI, or perhaps hard code a call in each constructor. One
consideration is that init() can change the IR, so perhaps it should
appear in CoroSplit::run(), but this looks a bit odd. Invoking init() in
the constructor would result in the call appearing 4 times per ABI
(after adding the new constructors). Invoking it in CreateAndInitABI
seems to be a balance between these.
See RFC for more info:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-abi-objects-for-coroutines/81057
0 commit comments