[SelectionDAG] Fix NaN regression in fma dag-combine. (#146592)

After 901e139 (#127770), the DAG
combine would transform `fma(x, 0.0, 1.0)` into `1.0` if
`-fp-contract=fast` was enabled, in addition to when 'x' is marked
nnan/ninf.

It's only valid in the latter case, not the former, so delete the extra
condition.

Author: jyknight

llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

@@ -18087,8 +18087,7 @@ template <class MatchContextClass> SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFMA(SDNode *N) {
 
   // FIXME: use fast math flags instead of Options.UnsafeFPMath
   // TODO: Finally migrate away from global TargetOptions.
-  if (Options.AllowFPOpFusion == FPOpFusion::Fast ||
-      (Options.NoNaNsFPMath && Options.NoInfsFPMath) ||
+  if ((Options.NoNaNsFPMath && Options.NoInfsFPMath) ||
       (N->getFlags().hasNoNaNs() && N->getFlags().hasNoInfs())) {
     if (Options.NoSignedZerosFPMath || N->getFlags().hasNoSignedZeros() ||
         (N2CFP && !N2CFP->isExactlyValue(-0.0))) {

llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dag-combiner-fma-folding.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
 ; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-- --start-before=x86-isel -mattr=+avx,+fma %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-- --start-before=x86-isel -mattr=+avx,+fma %s -o - -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s
 
 define double @fma_folding(double %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: fma_folding:
@@ -20,3 +21,14 @@ define double @fma_no_folding(double %x) {
   %fused = call contract nnan ninf double @llvm.fma.f64(double %x, double 0.0, double -0.0)
   ret double %fused
 }
+
+define double @fma_no_fold_potential_nan(double %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: fma_no_fold_potential_nan:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vxorpd %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vfmadd213sd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm1 * xmm0) + mem
+; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
+ %fused = call contract double @llvm.fma.f64(double %x, double 0.0, double 1.0)
+ ret double %fused
+}
+