[MLIR][NFC] modernize affine.for unroll test pass

The walk code here was written before any of the support was
available in IR/. Replace/cleanup.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77166

Author: bondhugula

mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopUnroll.cpp

@@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ static llvm::cl::opt<unsigned> clUnrollFullThreshold(
     llvm::cl::cat(clOptionsCategory));
 
 namespace {
+
+// TODO: this is really a test pass and should be moved out of dialect
+// transforms.
+
 /// Loop unrolling pass. Unrolls all innermost loops unless full unrolling and a
 /// full unroll threshold was specified, in which case, fully unrolls all loops
 /// with trip count less than the specified threshold. The latter is for testing
@@ -76,44 +80,32 @@ struct LoopUnroll : public FunctionPass<LoopUnroll> {
 };
 } // end anonymous namespace
 
-void LoopUnroll::runOnFunction() {
-  // Gathers all innermost loops through a post order pruned walk.
-  struct InnermostLoopGatherer {
-    // Store innermost loops as we walk.
-    std::vector<AffineForOp> loops;
-
-    void walkPostOrder(FuncOp f) {
-      for (auto &b : f)
-        walkPostOrder(b.begin(), b.end());
-    }
-
-    bool walkPostOrder(Block::iterator Start, Block::iterator End) {
-      bool hasInnerLoops = false;
-      // We need to walk all elements since all innermost loops need to be
-      // gathered as opposed to determining whether this list has any inner
-      // loops or not.
-      while (Start != End)
-        hasInnerLoops |= walkPostOrder(&(*Start++));
-      return hasInnerLoops;
-    }
-    bool walkPostOrder(Operation *opInst) {
-      bool hasInnerLoops = false;
-      for (auto &region : opInst->getRegions())
-        for (auto &block : region)
-          hasInnerLoops |= walkPostOrder(block.begin(), block.end());
-      if (isa<AffineForOp>(opInst)) {
-        if (!hasInnerLoops)
-          loops.push_back(cast<AffineForOp>(opInst));
-        return true;
-      }
-      return hasInnerLoops;
-    }
-  };
+/// Returns true if no other affine.for ops are nested within.
+static bool isInnermostAffineForOp(AffineForOp forOp) {
+  // Only for the innermost affine.for op's.
+  bool isInnermost = true;
+  forOp.walk([&](AffineForOp thisForOp) {
+    // Since this is a post order walk, we are able to conclude here.
+    isInnermost = (thisForOp == forOp);
+    return WalkResult::interrupt();
+  });
+  return isInnermost;
+}
 
+/// Gathers loops that have no affine.for's nested within.
+static void gatherInnermostLoops(FuncOp f,
+                                 SmallVectorImpl<AffineForOp> &loops) {
+  f.walk([&](AffineForOp forOp) {
+    if (isInnermostAffineForOp(forOp))
+      loops.push_back(forOp);
+  });
+}
+
+void LoopUnroll::runOnFunction() {
   if (clUnrollFull.getNumOccurrences() > 0 &&
       clUnrollFullThreshold.getNumOccurrences() > 0) {
     // Store short loops as we walk.
-    std::vector<AffineForOp> loops;
+    SmallVector<AffineForOp, 4> loops;
 
     // Gathers all loops with trip count <= minTripCount. Do a post order walk
     // so that loops are gathered from innermost to outermost (or else unrolling
@@ -133,10 +125,10 @@ void LoopUnroll::runOnFunction() {
                                 : 1;
   // If the call back is provided, we will recurse until no loops are found.
   FuncOp func = getFunction();
+  SmallVector<AffineForOp, 4> loops;
   for (unsigned i = 0; i < numRepetitions || getUnrollFactor; i++) {
-    InnermostLoopGatherer ilg;
-    ilg.walkPostOrder(func);
-    auto &loops = ilg.loops;
+    loops.clear();
+    gatherInnermostLoops(func, loops);
     if (loops.empty())
       break;
     bool unrolled = false;