Skip to content

[SCCP] Propagate exact flags #72432

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dtcxzyw
Copy link
Member

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw commented Nov 15, 2023

This patch propagates exact flags for ashr->lshr and sdiv->udiv in SCCP.

This missed optimization is discovered with the help of AliveToolkit/alive2#962.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Nov 15, 2023

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

@llvm/pr-subscribers-function-specialization

Author: Yingwei Zheng (dtcxzyw)

Changes

This patch propagates exact flags for ashr->lshr and sdiv->udiv in SCCP.

This missed optimization is discovered with the help of AliveToolkit/alive2#962.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72432.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SCCPSolver.cpp (+3)
  • (added) llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/exact-flags.ll (+28)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SCCPSolver.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SCCPSolver.cpp
index dac10c2a8baf9e1..ab95698abc4399d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SCCPSolver.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SCCPSolver.cpp
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static bool replaceSignedInst(SCCPSolver &Solver,
     if (InsertedValues.count(Op0) || !isNonNegative(Op0))
       return false;
     NewInst = BinaryOperator::CreateLShr(Op0, Inst.getOperand(1), "", &Inst);
+    NewInst->setIsExact(Inst.isExact());
     break;
   }
   case Instruction::SDiv:
@@ -199,6 +200,8 @@ static bool replaceSignedInst(SCCPSolver &Solver,
     auto NewOpcode = Inst.getOpcode() == Instruction::SDiv ? Instruction::UDiv
                                                            : Instruction::URem;
     NewInst = BinaryOperator::Create(NewOpcode, Op0, Op1, "", &Inst);
+    if (Inst.getOpcode() == Instruction::SDiv)
+      NewInst->setIsExact(Inst.isExact());
     break;
   }
   default:
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/exact-flags.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/exact-flags.ll
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..a5e3bf111bbd9da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/exact-flags.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+; RUN: opt -passes=sccp < %s -S | FileCheck %s
+
+define i8 @ashr_to_lshr(i8 %x, i8 %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i8 @ashr_to_lshr(
+; CHECK-SAME: i8 [[X:%.*]], i8 [[Y:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[P:%.*]] = and i8 [[X]], 127
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = lshr exact i8 [[P]], [[Y]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i8 [[R]]
+;
+  %p = and i8 %x, 127
+  %r = ashr exact i8 %p, %y
+  ret i8 %r
+}
+
+define i8 @sdiv_to_udiv(i8 %x, i8 %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i8 @sdiv_to_udiv(
+; CHECK-SAME: i8 [[X:%.*]], i8 [[Y:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[X1:%.*]] = and i8 [[X]], 127
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[Y1:%.*]] = and i8 [[Y]], 127
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = udiv exact i8 [[X1]], [[Y1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i8 [[R]]
+;
+  %x1 = and i8 %x, 127
+  %y1 = and i8 %y, 127
+  %r = sdiv exact i8 %x1, %y1
+  ret i8 %r
+}

Copy link
Contributor

@nikic nikic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw merged commit c3b9c36 into llvm:main Nov 16, 2023
@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw deleted the sccp-propagate-exact-flag branch November 16, 2023 06:05
sr-tream pushed a commit to sr-tream/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
This patch propagates exact flags for `ashr->lshr` and `sdiv->udiv` in
SCCP.

This missed optimization is discovered with the help of
AliveToolkit/alive2#962.
zahiraam pushed a commit to zahiraam/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
This patch propagates exact flags for `ashr->lshr` and `sdiv->udiv` in
SCCP.

This missed optimization is discovered with the help of
AliveToolkit/alive2#962.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants