Skip to content

[ProfileData] Migrate to a new version of getValueProfDataFromInst #96381

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

kazutakahirata
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@llvmbot llvmbot added the PGO Profile Guided Optimizations label Jun 22, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 22, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-pgo

Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96381.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp (+10-16)
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp
index a2cda2ba52dfe..a28352057e3a6 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp
@@ -942,12 +942,10 @@ TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, annotate_vp_data) {
   Instruction *Inst2 = Builder.CreateCondBr(Builder.getTrue(), TBB, FBB);
   annotateValueSite(*M, *Inst, R.get(), IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0);
 
-  uint32_t N;
   uint64_t T;
   auto ValueData =
-      getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5, N, T);
-  ASSERT_NE(ValueData, nullptr);
-  ASSERT_EQ(3U, N);
+      getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5, T);
+  ASSERT_THAT(ValueData, SizeIs(3));
   ASSERT_EQ(21U, T);
   // The result should be sorted already:
   ASSERT_EQ(6000U, ValueData[0].Value);
@@ -956,22 +954,19 @@ TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, annotate_vp_data) {
   ASSERT_EQ(5U, ValueData[1].Count);
   ASSERT_EQ(4000U, ValueData[2].Value);
   ASSERT_EQ(4U, ValueData[2].Count);
-  ValueData = getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1, N, T);
-  ASSERT_NE(ValueData, nullptr);
-  ASSERT_EQ(1U, N);
+  ValueData = getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1, T);
+  ASSERT_THAT(ValueData, SizeIs(1));
   ASSERT_EQ(21U, T);
 
-  ValueData =
-      getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst2, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5, N, T);
-  ASSERT_EQ(ValueData, nullptr);
+  ValueData = getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst2, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5, T);
+  ASSERT_THAT(ValueData, SizeIs(0));
 
   // Remove the MD_prof metadata
   Inst->setMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof, 0);
   // Annotate 5 records this time.
   annotateValueSite(*M, *Inst, R.get(), IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, 5);
-  ValueData = getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5, N, T);
-  ASSERT_NE(ValueData, nullptr);
-  ASSERT_EQ(5U, N);
+  ValueData = getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5, T);
+  ASSERT_THAT(ValueData, SizeIs(5));
   ASSERT_EQ(21U, T);
   ASSERT_EQ(6000U, ValueData[0].Value);
   ASSERT_EQ(6U, ValueData[0].Count);
@@ -991,9 +986,8 @@ TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, annotate_vp_data) {
                               {5000, 2}, {6000, 1}};
   annotateValueSite(*M, *Inst, ArrayRef(VD0Sorted).slice(2), 10,
                     IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5);
-  ValueData = getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5, N, T);
-  ASSERT_NE(ValueData, nullptr);
-  ASSERT_EQ(4U, N);
+  ValueData = getValueProfDataFromInst(*Inst, IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5, T);
+  ASSERT_THAT(ValueData, SizeIs(4));
   ASSERT_EQ(10U, T);
   ASSERT_EQ(3000U, ValueData[0].Value);
   ASSERT_EQ(4U, ValueData[0].Count);

@kazutakahirata kazutakahirata force-pushed the cleanup_ProfileData_getValueProfDataFromInst_unittests branch from 0ac0691 to ab86bdf Compare June 28, 2024 23:09
@kazutakahirata kazutakahirata merged commit 40a5a86 into llvm:main Jun 29, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
lravenclaw pushed a commit to lravenclaw/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2024
@kazutakahirata kazutakahirata deleted the cleanup_ProfileData_getValueProfDataFromInst_unittests branch January 22, 2025 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PGO Profile Guided Optimizations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants