You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Whenever allocation larger than the largest allocation class
was requested base_alloc_global was calling ba_os_alloc and
wasn't marking the memory in any way. This was problematic as
address returned from ba_os_alloc could have been the same as
an address used for other instance of umf_ba_pool_t. If that
other instance had been destroyed the memory address would
still be marked as inaccessible.
0 commit comments