Skip to content

refactor(constraint): update none compound constraint to be not #221

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

tylerslaton
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Tyler Slaton [email protected]

Summary

Updating this code to fit the new recent changes to the compound constraints EP in an effort to make this UX clearer. This PR simple updates the code to reference not instead of none.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from exdx and perdasilva January 25, 2022 19:43
@tylerslaton tylerslaton added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 25, 2022
@tylerslaton tylerslaton force-pushed the none-to-not-constraint branch from d9e657c to 844646c Compare January 25, 2022 19:49
@tylerslaton tylerslaton removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 25, 2022
Copy link
Member

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 25, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dinhxuanvu, tylerslaton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 25, 2022
@tylerslaton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 25, 2022
Copy link
Member

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 26, 2022
@tylerslaton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 26, 2022
@awgreene
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
The failing go-apidiff test can be ignored since we've made the decision to rename constraints.None to constraints.Not.

@awgreene awgreene merged commit 96da8f9 into operator-framework:master Jan 26, 2022
@tylerslaton tylerslaton deleted the none-to-not-constraint branch January 26, 2022 19:27
timflannagan pushed a commit to timflannagan/of-api that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants