You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Lockdep noticed the following 3-way lockup scenario:
sys_perf_event_open()
perf_event_alloc()
perf_try_init_event()
#0 ctx = perf_event_ctx_lock_nested(1)
perf_swevent_init()
swevent_hlist_get()
#1 mutex_lock(&pmus_lock)
perf_event_init_cpu()
#1 mutex_lock(&pmus_lock)
#2 mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex)
sys_perf_event_open()
mutex_lock_double()
#2 mutex_lock()
#0 mutex_lock_nested()
And while we need that perf_event_ctx_lock_nested() for HW PMUs such
that they can iterate the sibling list, trying to match it to the
available counters, the software PMUs need do no such thing. Exclude
them.
In particular the swevent triggers the above invertion, while the
tpevent PMU triggers a more elaborate one through their event_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vince Weaver <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
0 commit comments