You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
unshare: Unsharing a thread does not require unsharing a vm
In the logic in the initial commit of unshare made creating a new
thread group for a process, contingent upon creating a new memory
address space for that process. That is wrong. Two separate
processes in different thread groups can share a memory address space
and clone allows creation of such proceses.
This is significant because it was observed that mm_users > 1 does not
mean that a process is multi-threaded, as reading /proc/PID/maps
temporarily increments mm_users, which allows other processes to
(accidentally) interfere with unshare() calls.
Correct the check in check_unshare_flags() to test for
!thread_group_empty() for CLONE_THREAD, CLONE_SIGHAND, and CLONE_VM.
For sighand->count > 1 for CLONE_SIGHAND and CLONE_VM.
For !current_is_single_threaded instead of mm_users > 1 for CLONE_VM.
By using the correct checks in unshare this removes the possibility of
an accidental denial of service attack.
Additionally using the correct checks in unshare ensures that only an
explicit unshare(CLONE_VM) can possibly trigger the slow path of
current_is_single_threaded(). As an explict unshare(CLONE_VM) is
pointless it is not expected there are many applications that make
that call.
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: b2e0d98 userns: Implement unshare of the user namespace
Reported-by: Ricky Zhou <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
0 commit comments