bpf: Make internal bpf API independent of CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL #ifdefs

Socket filter code and other subsystems with upcoming eBPF
support should not need to deal with the fact that we have
CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL defined or not.

Having the bpf syscall as a config option is a nice thing and
I'd expect it to stay that way for expert users (I presume one
day the default setting of it might change, though), but code
making use of it should not care if it's actually enabled or
not.

Instead, hide this via header files and let the rest deal with it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Author: borkmann

include/linux/bpf.h

@@ -113,8 +113,6 @@ struct bpf_prog_type_list {
 	enum bpf_prog_type type;
 };
 
-void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl);
-
 struct bpf_prog;
 
 struct bpf_prog_aux {
@@ -129,11 +127,25 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl);
+
 void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog);
+struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd);
 #else
-static inline void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog) {}
+static inline void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl)
+{
+}
+
+static inline struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd)
+{
+	return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+}
 #endif
-struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd);
+
 /* verify correctness of eBPF program */
 int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog *fp, union bpf_attr *attr);