tpm: atmel: Drop PPC64 specific MMIO setup

The PPC64 specific MMIO setup open codes DT address functions rather
than using standard address parsing functions. The open-coded version
fails to handle any address translation and is not endian safe.

I haven't found any evidence of what platform used this. The only thing
that turned up was a PPC405 platform, but that is 32-bit and PPC405
support is being removed as well. CONFIG_TCG_ATMEL is not enabled for
any powerpc config and never was. The support was added in 2005 and
hasn't been touched since.

Rather than try to modernize and fix this code, just remove it.

[jarkko: fixed couple of style issues reported by checkpatch.pl --strict
 and put offset into parentheses in the macro declarations.]
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>

Author: robherring

drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ config TCG_NSC
 
 config TCG_ATMEL
 	tristate "Atmel TPM Interface"
-	depends on PPC64 || HAS_IOPORT_MAP
+	depends on HAS_IOPORT_MAP
 	depends on HAS_IOPORT
 	help
 	  If you have a TPM security chip from Atmel say Yes and it 

drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c

@@ -15,7 +15,66 @@
  */
 
 #include "tpm.h"
-#include "tpm_atmel.h"
+
+struct tpm_atmel_priv {
+	int region_size;
+	int have_region;
+	unsigned long base;
+	void __iomem *iobase;
+};
+
+#define atmel_getb(chip, offset) inb(atmel_get_priv(chip)->base + (offset))
+#define atmel_putb(val, chip, offset) \
+	outb(val, atmel_get_priv(chip)->base + (offset))
+#define atmel_request_region request_region
+#define atmel_release_region release_region
+/* Atmel definitions */
+enum tpm_atmel_addr {
+	TPM_ATMEL_BASE_ADDR_LO = 0x08,
+	TPM_ATMEL_BASE_ADDR_HI = 0x09
+};
+
+static inline int tpm_read_index(int base, int index)
+{
+	outb(index, base);
+	return inb(base + 1) & 0xFF;
+}
+
+/* Verify this is a 1.1 Atmel TPM */
+static int atmel_verify_tpm11(void)
+{
+	/* verify that it is an Atmel part */
+	if (tpm_read_index(TPM_ADDR, 4) != 'A' ||
+	    tpm_read_index(TPM_ADDR, 5) != 'T' ||
+	    tpm_read_index(TPM_ADDR, 6) != 'M' ||
+	    tpm_read_index(TPM_ADDR, 7) != 'L')
+		return 1;
+
+	/* query chip for its version number */
+	if (tpm_read_index(TPM_ADDR, 0x00) != 1 ||
+	    tpm_read_index(TPM_ADDR, 0x01) != 1)
+		return 1;
+
+	/* This is an atmel supported part */
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Determine where to talk to device */
+static void __iomem *atmel_get_base_addr(unsigned long *base, int *region_size)
+{
+	int lo, hi;
+
+	if (atmel_verify_tpm11() != 0)
+		return NULL;
+
+	lo = tpm_read_index(TPM_ADDR, TPM_ATMEL_BASE_ADDR_LO);
+	hi = tpm_read_index(TPM_ADDR, TPM_ATMEL_BASE_ADDR_HI);
+
+	*base = (hi << 8) | lo;
+	*region_size = 2;
+
+	return ioport_map(*base, *region_size);
+}
 
 /* write status bits */
 enum tpm_atmel_write_status {
@@ -142,7 +201,6 @@ static void atml_plat_remove(void)
 	tpm_chip_unregister(chip);
 	if (priv->have_region)
 		atmel_release_region(priv->base, priv->region_size);
-	atmel_put_base_addr(priv->iobase);
 	platform_device_unregister(pdev);
 }
 
@@ -211,7 +269,6 @@ static int __init init_atmel(void)
 err_unreg_dev:
 	platform_device_unregister(pdev);
 err_rel_reg:
-	atmel_put_base_addr(iobase);
 	if (have_region)
 		atmel_release_region(base,
 				     region_size);