Skip to content

Commit 6492fed

Browse files
rafaeljwalexandrebelloni
authored andcommitted
rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0
The ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag merely means that it is better to use low-power S0 idle on the given platform than S3 (provided that the latter is supported) and it doesn't preclude using either of them (which of them will be used depends on the choices made by user space). For this reason, there is no benefit from checking that flag in use_acpi_alarm_quirks(). First off, it cannot be a bug to do S3 with use_acpi_alarm set, because S3 can be used on systems with ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 and it must work if really supported, so the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 check is not needed to protect the S3-capable systems from failing. Second, suspend-to-idle can be carried out on a system with ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 unset and it is expected to work, so if setting use_acpi_alarm is needed to handle that case correctly, it should be set regardless of the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 value. Accordingly, drop the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 check from use_acpi_alarm_quirks(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/12054246.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher
1 parent c9a1dd6 commit 6492fed

File tree

1 file changed

+0
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+0
-3
lines changed

drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c

Lines changed: 0 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1260,9 +1260,6 @@ static void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void)
12601260
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
12611261
return;
12621262

1263-
if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0))
1264-
return;
1265-
12661263
if (!is_hpet_enabled())
12671264
return;
12681265

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)