sched/deadline: Rename __dl_clear() to __dl_sub()

__dl_sub() is more meaningful as a name, and is more consistent
with the naming of the dual function (__dl_add()).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Author: Peter Zijlstra

kernel/sched/deadline.c

@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p)
 			if (p->state == TASK_DEAD)
 				sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl);
 			raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
-			__dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)));
+			__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)));
 			__dl_clear_params(p);
 			raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
 		}
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart inactive_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
 		}
 
 		raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
-		__dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)));
+		__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)));
 		raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
 		__dl_clear_params(p);
 
@@ -2170,7 +2170,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_dl(struct task_struct *p,
 		 * until we complete the update.
 		 */
 		raw_spin_lock(&src_dl_b->lock);
-		__dl_clear(src_dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)));
+		__dl_sub(src_dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)));
 		raw_spin_unlock(&src_dl_b->lock);
 	}
 
@@ -2448,7 +2448,7 @@ int sched_dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
 	if (dl_policy(policy) && !task_has_dl_policy(p) &&
 	    !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, new_bw)) {
 		if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer))
-			__dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
+			__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
 		__dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus);
 		err = 0;
 	} else if (dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p) &&
@@ -2460,7 +2460,7 @@ int sched_dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
 		 * But this would require to set the task's "inactive
 		 * timer" when the task is not inactive.
 		 */
-		__dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
+		__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
 		__dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus);
 		dl_change_utilization(p, new_bw);
 		err = 0;

kernel/sched/sched.h

@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ struct dl_bw {
 static inline void __dl_update(struct dl_bw *dl_b, s64 bw);
 
 static inline
-void __dl_clear(struct dl_bw *dl_b, u64 tsk_bw, int cpus)
+void __dl_sub(struct dl_bw *dl_b, u64 tsk_bw, int cpus)
 {
 	dl_b->total_bw -= tsk_bw;
 	__dl_update(dl_b, (s32)tsk_bw / cpus);