Merge branch 'pm-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm

* 'pm-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
  PM: Update comments describing device power management callbacks
  PM / Sleep: Update documentation related to system wakeup
  PM / Runtime: Make documentation follow the new behavior of irq_safe
  PM / Sleep: Correct inaccurate information in devices.txt
  PM / Domains: Document how PM domains are used by the PM core
  PM / Hibernate: Do not leak memory in error/test code paths

Author: torvalds

Documentation/power/devices.txt

@@ -123,9 +123,10 @@ please refer directly to the source code for more information about it.
 Subsystem-Level Methods
 -----------------------
 The core methods to suspend and resume devices reside in struct dev_pm_ops
-pointed to by the pm member of struct bus_type, struct device_type and
-struct class.  They are mostly of interest to the people writing infrastructure
-for buses, like PCI or USB, or device type and device class drivers.
+pointed to by the ops member of struct dev_pm_domain, or by the pm member of
+struct bus_type, struct device_type and struct class.  They are mostly of
+interest to the people writing infrastructure for platforms and buses, like PCI
+or USB, or device type and device class drivers.
 
 Bus drivers implement these methods as appropriate for the hardware and the
 drivers using it; PCI works differently from USB, and so on.  Not many people
@@ -139,41 +140,57 @@ sequencing in the driver model tree.
 
 /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup files
 -----------------------------------
-All devices in the driver model have two flags to control handling of wakeup
-events (hardware signals that can force the device and/or system out of a low
-power state).  These flags are initialized by bus or device driver code using
+All device objects in the driver model contain fields that control the handling
+of system wakeup events (hardware signals that can force the system out of a
+sleep state).  These fields are initialized by bus or device driver code using
 device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_set_wakeup_enable(), defined in
 include/linux/pm_wakeup.h.
 
-The "can_wakeup" flag just records whether the device (and its driver) can
+The "power.can_wakeup" flag just records whether the device (and its driver) can
 physically support wakeup events.  The device_set_wakeup_capable() routine
-affects this flag.  The "should_wakeup" flag controls whether the device should
-try to use its wakeup mechanism.  device_set_wakeup_enable() affects this flag;
-for the most part drivers should not change its value.  The initial value of
-should_wakeup is supposed to be false for the majority of devices; the major
-exceptions are power buttons, keyboards, and Ethernet adapters whose WoL
-(wake-on-LAN) feature has been set up with ethtool.  It should also default
-to true for devices that don't generate wakeup requests on their own but merely
-forward wakeup requests from one bus to another (like PCI bridges).
+affects this flag.  The "power.wakeup" field is a pointer to an object of type
+struct wakeup_source used for controlling whether or not the device should use
+its system wakeup mechanism and for notifying the PM core of system wakeup
+events signaled by the device.  This object is only present for wakeup-capable
+devices (i.e. devices whose "can_wakeup" flags are set) and is created (or
+removed) by device_set_wakeup_capable().
 
 Whether or not a device is capable of issuing wakeup events is a hardware
 matter, and the kernel is responsible for keeping track of it.  By contrast,
 whether or not a wakeup-capable device should issue wakeup events is a policy
 decision, and it is managed by user space through a sysfs attribute: the
-power/wakeup file.  User space can write the strings "enabled" or "disabled" to
-set or clear the "should_wakeup" flag, respectively.  This file is only present
-for wakeup-capable devices (i.e. devices whose "can_wakeup" flags are set)
-and is created (or removed) by device_set_wakeup_capable().  Reads from the
-file will return the corresponding string.
-
-The device_may_wakeup() routine returns true only if both flags are set.
+"power/wakeup" file.  User space can write the strings "enabled" or "disabled"
+to it to indicate whether or not, respectively, the device is supposed to signal
+system wakeup.  This file is only present if the "power.wakeup" object exists
+for the given device and is created (or removed) along with that object, by
+device_set_wakeup_capable().  Reads from the file will return the corresponding
+string.
+
+The "power/wakeup" file is supposed to contain the "disabled" string initially
+for the majority of devices; the major exceptions are power buttons, keyboards,
+and Ethernet adapters whose WoL (wake-on-LAN) feature has been set up with
+ethtool.  It should also default to "enabled" for devices that don't generate
+wakeup requests on their own but merely forward wakeup requests from one bus to
+another (like PCI Express ports).
+
+The device_may_wakeup() routine returns true only if the "power.wakeup" object
+exists and the corresponding "power/wakeup" file contains the string "enabled".
 This information is used by subsystems, like the PCI bus type code, to see
 whether or not to enable the devices' wakeup mechanisms.  If device wakeup
 mechanisms are enabled or disabled directly by drivers, they also should use
 device_may_wakeup() to decide what to do during a system sleep transition.
-However for runtime power management, wakeup events should be enabled whenever
-the device and driver both support them, regardless of the should_wakeup flag.
-
+Device drivers, however, are not supposed to call device_set_wakeup_enable()
+directly in any case.
+
+It ought to be noted that system wakeup is conceptually different from "remote
+wakeup" used by runtime power management, although it may be supported by the
+same physical mechanism.  Remote wakeup is a feature allowing devices in
+low-power states to trigger specific interrupts to signal conditions in which
+they should be put into the full-power state.  Those interrupts may or may not
+be used to signal system wakeup events, depending on the hardware design.  On
+some systems it is impossible to trigger them from system sleep states.  In any
+case, remote wakeup should always be enabled for runtime power management for
+all devices and drivers that support it.
 
 /sys/devices/.../power/control files
 ------------------------------------
@@ -249,20 +266,31 @@ for every device before the next phase begins.  Not all busses or classes
 support all these callbacks and not all drivers use all the callbacks.  The
 various phases always run after tasks have been frozen and before they are
 unfrozen.  Furthermore, the *_noirq phases run at a time when IRQ handlers have
-been disabled (except for those marked with the IRQ_WAKEUP flag).
-
-All phases use bus, type, or class callbacks (that is, methods defined in
-dev->bus->pm, dev->type->pm, or dev->class->pm).  These callbacks are mutually
-exclusive, so if the device type provides a struct dev_pm_ops object pointed to
-by its pm field (i.e. both dev->type and dev->type->pm are defined), the
-callbacks included in that object (i.e. dev->type->pm) will be used.  Otherwise,
-if the class provides a struct dev_pm_ops object pointed to by its pm field
-(i.e. both dev->class and dev->class->pm are defined), the PM core will use the
-callbacks from that object (i.e. dev->class->pm).  Finally, if the pm fields of
-both the device type and class objects are NULL (or those objects do not exist),
-the callbacks provided by the bus (that is, the callbacks from dev->bus->pm)
-will be used (this allows device types to override callbacks provided by bus
-types or classes if necessary).
+been disabled (except for those marked with the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag).
+
+All phases use PM domain, bus, type, or class callbacks (that is, methods
+defined in dev->pm_domain->ops, dev->bus->pm, dev->type->pm, or dev->class->pm).
+These callbacks are regarded by the PM core as mutually exclusive.  Moreover,
+PM domain callbacks always take precedence over bus, type and class callbacks,
+while type callbacks take precedence over bus and class callbacks, and class
+callbacks take precedence over bus callbacks.  To be precise, the following
+rules are used to determine which callback to execute in the given phase:
+
+    1.	If dev->pm_domain is present, the PM core will attempt to execute the
+	callback included in dev->pm_domain->ops.  If that callback is not
+	present, no action will be carried out for the given device.
+
+    2.	Otherwise, if both dev->type and dev->type->pm are present, the callback
+	included in dev->type->pm will be executed.
+
+    3.	Otherwise, if both dev->class and dev->class->pm are present, the
+	callback included in dev->class->pm will be executed.
+
+    4.	Otherwise, if both dev->bus and dev->bus->pm are present, the callback
+	included in dev->bus->pm will be executed.
+
+This allows PM domains and device types to override callbacks provided by bus
+types or device classes if necessary.
 
 These callbacks may in turn invoke device- or driver-specific methods stored in
 dev->driver->pm, but they don't have to.
@@ -283,9 +311,8 @@ When the system goes into the standby or memory sleep state, the phases are:
 
 	After the prepare callback method returns, no new children may be
 	registered below the device.  The method may also prepare the device or
-	driver in some way for the upcoming system power transition (for
-	example, by allocating additional memory required for this purpose), but
-	it should not put the device into a low-power state.
+	driver in some way for the upcoming system power transition, but it
+	should not put the device into a low-power state.
 
     2.	The suspend methods should quiesce the device to stop it from performing
 	I/O.  They also may save the device registers and put it into the

Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt

@@ -44,25 +44,33 @@ struct dev_pm_ops {
 };
 
 The ->runtime_suspend(), ->runtime_resume() and ->runtime_idle() callbacks
-are executed by the PM core for either the power domain, or the device type
-(if the device power domain's struct dev_pm_ops does not exist), or the class
-(if the device power domain's and type's struct dev_pm_ops object does not
-exist), or the bus type (if the device power domain's, type's and class'
-struct dev_pm_ops objects do not exist) of the given device, so the priority
-order of callbacks from high to low is that power domain callbacks, device
-type callbacks, class callbacks and bus type callbacks, and the high priority
-one will take precedence over low priority one. The bus type, device type and
-class callbacks are referred to as subsystem-level callbacks in what follows,
-and generally speaking, the power domain callbacks are used for representing
-power domains within a SoC.
+are executed by the PM core for the device's subsystem that may be either of
+the following:
+
+  1. PM domain of the device, if the device's PM domain object, dev->pm_domain,
+     is present.
+
+  2. Device type of the device, if both dev->type and dev->type->pm are present.
+
+  3. Device class of the device, if both dev->class and dev->class->pm are
+     present.
+
+  4. Bus type of the device, if both dev->bus and dev->bus->pm are present.
+
+The PM core always checks which callback to use in the order given above, so the
+priority order of callbacks from high to low is: PM domain, device type, class
+and bus type.  Moreover, the high-priority one will always take precedence over
+a low-priority one.  The PM domain, bus type, device type and class callbacks
+are referred to as subsystem-level callbacks in what follows.
 
 By default, the callbacks are always invoked in process context with interrupts
 enabled.  However, subsystems can use the pm_runtime_irq_safe() helper function
-to tell the PM core that a device's ->runtime_suspend() and ->runtime_resume()
-callbacks should be invoked in atomic context with interrupts disabled.
-This implies that these callback routines must not block or sleep, but it also
-means that the synchronous helper functions listed at the end of Section 4 can
-be used within an interrupt handler or in an atomic context.
+to tell the PM core that their ->runtime_suspend(), ->runtime_resume() and
+->runtime_idle() callbacks may be invoked in atomic context with interrupts
+disabled for a given device.  This implies that the callback routines in
+question must not block or sleep, but it also means that the synchronous helper
+functions listed at the end of Section 4 may be used for that device within an
+interrupt handler or generally in an atomic context.
 
 The subsystem-level suspend callback is _entirely_ _responsible_ for handling
 the suspend of the device as appropriate, which may, but need not include