btrfs: check_int: propagate out-of-memory error upwards

This issue was not causing any harm but IMO (and in the opinion of the
static code checker) it is better to propagate this error status upwards.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <[email protected]>

Author: Stefan Behrens

fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c

@@ -1093,6 +1093,7 @@ static int btrfsic_process_metablock(
 					next_stack =
 					    btrfsic_stack_frame_alloc();
 					if (NULL == next_stack) {
+						sf->error = -1;
 						btrfsic_release_block_ctx(
 								&sf->
 								next_block_ctx);
@@ -1190,8 +1191,10 @@ static int btrfsic_process_metablock(
 				    sf->next_block_ctx.datav[0];
 
 				next_stack = btrfsic_stack_frame_alloc();
-				if (NULL == next_stack)
+				if (NULL == next_stack) {
+					sf->error = -1;
 					goto one_stack_frame_backwards;
+				}
 
 				next_stack->i = -1;
 				next_stack->block = sf->next_block;