mm, slab: reschedule cache_reap() on the same CPU

cache_reap() is initially scheduled in start_cpu_timer() via
schedule_delayed_work_on(). But then the next iterations are scheduled
via schedule_delayed_work(), i.e. using WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.

Thus since commit ef55718 ("workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
work on wq_unbound_cpumask CPUs") there is no guarantee the future
iterations will run on the originally intended cpu, although it's still
preferred.  I was able to demonstrate this with
/sys/module/workqueue/parameters/debug_force_rr_cpu.  IIUC, it may also
happen due to migrating timers in nohz context.  As a result, some cpu's
would be calling cache_reap() more frequently and others never.

This patch uses schedule_delayed_work_on() with the current cpu when
scheduling the next iteration.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: ef55718 ("workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work on wq_unbound_cpumask CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Author: tehcaster

mm/slab.c

@@ -4086,7 +4086,8 @@ static void cache_reap(struct work_struct *w)
 	next_reap_node();
 out:
 	/* Set up the next iteration */
-	schedule_delayed_work(work, round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC));
+	schedule_delayed_work_on(smp_processor_id(), work,
+				round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC));
 }
 
 void get_slabinfo(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct slabinfo *sinfo)