x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

0day reported a possible circular locking dependency:

Chain exists of:
  &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&port_lock_key);
                               lock(console_owner);
                               lock(&port_lock_key);
  lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);

The reason for this is a printk() in the i8259 interrupt chip driver
which is invoked with the irq descriptor lock held, which reverses the
lock operations vs. printk() from arbitrary contexts.

Switch the printk() to printk_deferred() to avoid that.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Author: KAGA-KOKO

arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c

@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static void mask_and_ack_8259A(struct irq_data *data)
 		 * lets ACK and report it. [once per IRQ]
 		 */
 		if (!(spurious_irq_mask & irqmask)) {
-			printk(KERN_DEBUG
+			printk_deferred(KERN_DEBUG
 			       "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ%d.\n", irq);
 			spurious_irq_mask |= irqmask;
 		}