You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
cxl/region: Fix 'distance' calculation with passthrough ports
When programming port decode targets, the algorithm wants to ensure that
two devices are compatible to be programmed as peers beneath a given
port. A compatible peer is a target that shares the same dport, and
where that target's interleave position also routes it to the same
dport. Compatibility is determined by the device's interleave position
being >= to distance. For example, if a given dport can only map every
Nth position then positions less than N away from the last target
programmed are incompatible.
The @distance for the host-bridge's cxl_port in a simple dual-ported
host-bridge configuration with 2 direct-attached devices is 1, i.e. An
x2 region divided by 2 dports to reach 2 region targets.
An x4 region under an x2 host-bridge would need 2 intervening switches
where the @distance at the host bridge level is 2 (x4 region divided by
2 switches to reach 4 devices).
However, the distance between peers underneath a single ported
host-bridge is always zero because there is no limit to the number of
devices that can be mapped. In other words, there are no decoders to
program in a passthrough, all descendants are mapped and distance only
starts matters for the intervening descendant ports of the passthrough
port.
Add tracking for the number of dports mapped to a port, and use that to
detect the passthrough case for calculating @distance.
Cc: <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Bobo WL <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 27b3f8d ("cxl/region: Program target lists")
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166752185440.947915.6617495912508299445.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
0 commit comments