You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Mel reported that on some ARM64 platforms loadavg goes bananas and
Will tracked it down to the following race:
CPU0 CPU1
schedule()
prev->sched_contributes_to_load = X;
deactivate_task(prev);
try_to_wake_up()
if (p->on_rq &&) // false
if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) && // true
ttwu_queue_wakelist())
p->sched_remote_wakeup = Y;
smp_store_release(prev->on_cpu, 0);
where both p->sched_contributes_to_load and p->sched_remote_wakeup are
in the same word, and thus the stores X and Y race (and can clobber
one another's data).
Whereas prior to commit c6e7bd7 ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu()
spinning on p->on_cpu") the p->on_cpu handoff serialized access to
p->sched_remote_wakeup (just as it still does with
p->sched_contributes_to_load) that commit broke that by calling
ttwu_queue_wakelist() with p->on_cpu != 0.
However, due to
p->XXX = X ttwu()
schedule() if (p->on_rq && ...) // false
smp_mb__after_spinlock() if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) &&
deactivate_task() ttwu_queue_wakelist())
p->on_rq = 0; p->sched_remote_wakeup = Y;
We can be sure any 'current' store is complete and 'current' is
guaranteed asleep. Therefore we can move p->sched_remote_wakeup into
the current flags word.
Note: while the observed failure was loadavg accounting gone wrong due
to ttwu() cobbering p->sched_contributes_to_load, the reverse problem
is also possible where schedule() clobbers p->sched_remote_wakeup,
this could result in enqueue_entity() wrecking ->vruntime and causing
scheduling artifacts.
Fixes: c6e7bd7 ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu")
Reported-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Debugged-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
0 commit comments