Skip to content

Removes styles from SplitItem #209

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from
Closed

Removes styles from SplitItem #209

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

jtreminio
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #205

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #209 into item-style will increase coverage by 0.51%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             item-style     #209      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         92.48%   92.99%   +0.51%     
+ Complexity          559      553       -6     
================================================
  Files                30       30              
  Lines              1689     1671      -18     
================================================
- Hits               1562     1554       -8     
+ Misses              127      117      -10
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/Builder/CliMenuBuilder.php 78.57% <ø> (-0.19%) 76 <0> (ø)
src/Builder/SplitItemBuilder.php 81.25% <ø> (+10.93%) 14 <0> (-6) ⬇️
src/CliMenu.php 95.25% <ø> (ø) 113 <0> (ø) ⬇️
src/MenuItem/SplitItem.php 100% <100%> (ø) 45 <0> (ø) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4ea4242...e6b0383. Read the comment docs.

@jtreminio jtreminio closed this Dec 20, 2019
@jtreminio jtreminio deleted the feature/item-style-2 branch December 21, 2019 18:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants