Fixes in github issues template. (#4147)

Summary: Pull Request resolved: #4147

Reviewed By: dbort

Differential Revision: D59340632

fbshipit-source-id: 70f932edfd2ac38f8f58de88dcabdfc7308735d1

Author: mergennachin

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/documentation.yml

@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
 name: 📚 Documentation
-description: Report an issue related to https://pytorch.org/executorch/stable/index.html
+description: Report an issue related to https://pytorch.org/executorch/
 
 body:
 - type: textarea
   attributes:
     label: 📚 The doc issue
     description: >
-      A clear and concise description of what content in https://pytorch.org/executorch/stable/index.html is an issue.
+      A clear and concise description of what content in https://pytorch.org/executorch/ is an issue. Please include the URL to the page or pages with the problem.
   validations:
     required: true
 - type: textarea
   attributes:
     label: Suggest a potential alternative/fix
     description: >
-      Tell us how we could improve the documentation in this regard.
+      Tell us how we could improve the documentation.
 - type: markdown
   attributes:
     value: >

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.yml

@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ body:
   attributes:
     label: 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch
     description: >
-      A clear and concise description of the feature proposal. Please outline the motivation for the proposal. Is your feature request related to a specific problem? e.g., *"I'm working on X and would like Y to be possible"*. If this is related to another GitHub issue, please link here too.
+      A clear and concise description of the feature proposal. Please outline the motivation for the proposal. Is your feature request related to a specific problem? e.g., *"I'm working on X and would like Y to be possible"*. If this is related to another GitHub issue, please link to it here too.
   validations:
     required: true
 - type: textarea
   attributes:
     label: Alternatives
     description: >
-      A description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered, if any.
+      A description of alternative solutions or features you've considered, if any.
 - type: textarea
   attributes:
     label: Additional context
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ body:
   attributes:
     label: RFC (Optional)
     description: >
-      Explain the design in enough detail.
+      Explain the design in enough detail for others to understand the problem, scope, and proposed solution.
 - type: markdown
   attributes:
     value: >