Skip to content

Support named_data in flat_tensor #10629

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2025
Merged

Support named_data in flat_tensor #10629

merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2025

Conversation

pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #10527 by @lucylq
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/68/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/68/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/68/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

Pull Request resolved: #10527

Currently flat_tensor ndm only accounts for tensors in get_data, get_num_keys, get_key functions.
Add support to return named_data values as well.

TODO:consolidate tensors and named_data into one structure in the flatbuffer. This will simplify all the serialization and runtime code.
ghstack-source-id: 280786211

Differential Revision: [D73679683](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73679683/)
@pytorchbot pytorchbot requested a review from lucylq as a code owner May 1, 2025 21:43
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 1, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10629

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 1, 2025
@lucylq lucylq merged commit 09956d6 into main May 1, 2025
82 of 84 checks passed
@lucylq lucylq deleted the gh/lucylq/68/orig branch May 1, 2025 21:50
jhelsby pushed a commit to jhelsby/executorch that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
Currently flat_tensor ndm only accounts for tensors in get_data, get_num_keys, get_key functions.
Add support to return named_data values as well.

TODO:consolidate tensors and named_data into one structure in the flatbuffer. This will simplify all the serialization and runtime code.

Differential Revision: [D73679683](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73679683/)

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into
the main branch.
ghstack PR number: pytorch#10527 by
@lucylq
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments,
and reviews
ghstack PR base:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/68/base
ghstack PR head:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/68/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main
Merge bot PR head:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/68/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

Co-authored-by: lucylq <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants