Skip to content

Delete optimized sigmoid #11939

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2025
Merged

Delete optimized sigmoid #11939

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2025

Conversation

swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

We have vectorized (and parallelized) portable ops now as of #11912, so we don't need a handwritten optimized op that only does vectorization. (I spot-checked assembly to confirm the portable op is getting vectorized when we build optimized_portable_kernels.)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

swolchok commented Jun 24, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

@swolchok swolchok requested a review from manuelcandales as a code owner June 24, 2025 22:31
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 24, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11939

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 0196ccb with merge base 91c9ffa (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
We have vectorized (and parallelized) portable ops now as of #11912, so we don't need a handwritten optimized op that only does vectorization. (I spot-checked assembly to confirm the portable op is getting vectorized when we build optimized_portable_kernels.)


ghstack-source-id: 7ac8d91
ghstack-comment-id: 3002062946
Pull-Request-resolved: #11939
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 24, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@swolchok swolchok added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@manuelcandales manuelcandales left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, this is great!

@swolchok swolchok merged commit d5ca5e6 into main Jun 25, 2025
98 of 100 checks passed
@swolchok swolchok deleted the gh/swolchok/470/head branch June 25, 2025 15:29
hinriksnaer pushed a commit to hinriksnaer/executorch that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
We have vectorized (and parallelized) portable ops now as of pytorch#11912, so
we don't need a handwritten optimized op that only does vectorization.
(I spot-checked assembly to confirm the portable op is getting
vectorized when we build optimized_portable_kernels.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants