use partitioner instance directly in to_backend #2513
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/2513
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit 35c9718 with merge base 8f634a8 ( BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
16fbe96 to
0c8ada9
Compare
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2513 to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Differential Revision: D55078939
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2513 to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
0c8ada9 to
5cd4039
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2513 to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
5cd4039 to
987a9f0
Compare
mergennachin
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2024
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
987a9f0 to
66d07b5
Compare
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2513 to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Reviewed By: mergennachin Differential Revision: D55078939
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Summary: to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Reviewed By: mergennachin Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
66d07b5 to
3453d5d
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Summary: to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Reviewed By: mergennachin Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
3453d5d to
3d951e4
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Summary: to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Reviewed By: mergennachin Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
3d951e4 to
33be782
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
Summary: to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Reviewed By: mergennachin Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
33be782 to
15e3b43
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
Summary: to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Reviewed By: mergennachin Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
15e3b43 to
3794a19
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
Summary: to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Reviewed By: mergennachin Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
3794a19 to
c9041ee
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
Summary: to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner `key: method_name, value: partitioner`. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner. Reviewed By: mergennachin Differential Revision: D55078939
cccclai
force-pushed
the
export-D55078939
branch
from
c9041ee to
35c9718
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55078939 |
|
This pull request has been merged in c89a758. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: to_backend either takes partitioner or a dict of partitioner
key: method_name, value: partitioner. We shouldn't do key as the backend name and value as the partitioner.Differential Revision: D55078939