Skip to content

[pybind] Let find_package(executorch) find the correct include directory #6102

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

larryliu0820
Copy link
Contributor

There's a typo in executorch-wheel-config.cmake that points to the wrong include path:

<site-packages>/executorch/share/cmake/include

Where it actually should be

<site-packages>/executorch/include

Fixing this issue. Verified it on build_torchao_ops.sh

There's a typo in `executorch-wheel-config.cmake` that points to the wrong `include` path:
```
<site-packages>/executorch/share/cmake/include
```

Where it actually should be
```
<site-packages>/executorch/include
```

Fixing this issue. Verified it on [build_torchao_ops.sh](https://github.com/pytorch/ao/blob/main/torchao/experimental/build_torchao_ops.sh)
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 10, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/6102

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 95db331 with merge base df5b2ab (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Oct 10, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@larryliu0820 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@larryliu0820 larryliu0820 requested a review from dbort October 10, 2024 17:29
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@larryliu0820 merged this pull request in 15c1642.

@larryliu0820
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot cherry-pick --onto release/0.4 -c fixnewfeature

@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry picking #6102

Command git -C /home/runner/work/executorch/executorch cherry-pick -x -X theirs 15c16428828142cf52c9a11bb6432f18fd1d3bc2 returned non-zero exit code 1

CONFLICT (modify/delete): build/executorch-wheel-config.cmake deleted in HEAD and modified in 15c164288 (Let find_package(executorch) find the correct include directory (#6102)).  Version 15c164288 (Let find_package(executorch) find the correct include directory (#6102)) of build/executorch-wheel-config.cmake left in tree.
error: could not apply 15c164288... Let find_package(executorch) find the correct include directory (#6102)
hint: After resolving the conflicts, mark them with
hint: "git add/rm <pathspec>", then run
hint: "git cherry-pick --continue".
hint: You can instead skip this commit with "git cherry-pick --skip".
hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git cherry-pick",
hint: run "git cherry-pick --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

larryliu0820 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Summary:
There's a typo in `executorch-wheel-config.cmake` that points to the wrong `include` path:
```
<site-packages>/executorch/share/cmake/include
```

Where it actually should be
```
<site-packages>/executorch/include
```

Fixing this issue. Verified it on [build_torchao_ops.sh](https://github.com/pytorch/ao/blob/main/torchao/experimental/build_torchao_ops.sh)

Pull Request resolved: #6102

Reviewed By: lucylq

Differential Revision: D64189337

Pulled By: larryliu0820

fbshipit-source-id: 13033587f5499537623995b8f9457fb47d780340
@larryliu0820 larryliu0820 mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2024
larryliu0820 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Summary:
There's a typo in `executorch-wheel-config.cmake` that points to the wrong `include` path:
```
<site-packages>/executorch/share/cmake/include
```

Where it actually should be
```
<site-packages>/executorch/include
```

Fixing this issue. Verified it on [build_torchao_ops.sh](https://github.com/pytorch/ao/blob/main/torchao/experimental/build_torchao_ops.sh)

Pull Request resolved: #6102

Reviewed By: lucylq

Differential Revision: D64189337

Pulled By: larryliu0820

fbshipit-source-id: 13033587f5499537623995b8f9457fb47d780340
larryliu0820 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Summary:
There's a typo in `executorch-wheel-config.cmake` that points to the wrong `include` path:
```
<site-packages>/executorch/share/cmake/include
```

Where it actually should be
```
<site-packages>/executorch/include
```

Fixing this issue. Verified it on [build_torchao_ops.sh](https://github.com/pytorch/ao/blob/main/torchao/experimental/build_torchao_ops.sh)

Pull Request resolved: #6102

Reviewed By: lucylq

Differential Revision: D64189337

Pulled By: larryliu0820

fbshipit-source-id: 13033587f5499537623995b8f9457fb47d780340
larryliu0820 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
* Add MethodMeta object for python visibility (#5571)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #5571

Some clients and consumers of the Executorch program files (.pte) were
requesting ways to access metadata like the sizes of tensors and the number
of bytes they needed.
When I told them how to access them in C++, they requested Python wrappers
since they had processing scripts written in Python.

Add some implementations of MethodMeta and TensorInfo methods.
Note that these become more expensive than in C++ because they need to
allocate python objects, but I doubt these are used in
performance-sensitive applications anyway. And dealing with
lifetimes of mixed C++/Python objects is complex, so I favored simple lifetimes.

Reviewed By: dbort

Differential Revision: D63288433

fbshipit-source-id: af775120a8ebd9bf455671a8ce1f158259aa50e6

* Add mapping from C++ program::verification to Python (#5915)

Summary:
As titled. This enables
`portable_lib._load_for_executorch[_from_buffer]` to accept `Program::Verification` argument.

See added test, now we can do something like:

```
from executorch.extension.pybindings.portable_lib import Verification
module = load_fn(
  exported_program.buffer,
  enable_etdump=False,
  debug_buffer_size=0,
  program_verification=Verification.Minimal,
)
```

Pull Request resolved: #5915

Test Plan: See unit test

Reviewed By: dbort

Differential Revision: D63987538

Pulled By: larryliu0820

fbshipit-source-id: b68d8d1149e2d46b90544679707f420179e72b19

* Find portable_lib.so in pip package during cmake build (#5961)

Summary:
* Rename `_portable_lib.cpython-3.<distribution info>.so` to `_portable_lib.so` so it can be found by CMake `find_library()`. This can be achieved by setting `SETUPTOOLS_EXT_SUFFIX`.
* Since `executorch-config.cmake` is also being used to find installed libraries such as `executorch.a`, `xnnpack_backend.a`, add a condition to tell if `executorch-config.cmake` is being used in cmake-out or site-packages.

Pull Request resolved: #5961

Reviewed By: metascroy

Differential Revision: D64014291

Pulled By: larryliu0820

fbshipit-source-id: 2757f2883d3f836e9efd45676f792c12f742e63d

* Improve pip package build (#5965)

Summary:
Addressing comments in #5961.

* Separate out `executorch-wheel-config.cmake` from `executorch-config.cmake`.
* Hardcode the envrionment variable `SETUPTOOLS_EXT_SUFFIX` in `setup.py`.

Pull Request resolved: #5965

Reviewed By: dbort

Differential Revision: D64017947

Pulled By: larryliu0820

fbshipit-source-id: 0bdff5e2d2ec5873540d1b701595c7a316e84e80

* Let find_package(executorch) find the correct include directory (#6102)

Summary:
There's a typo in `executorch-wheel-config.cmake` that points to the wrong `include` path:
```
<site-packages>/executorch/share/cmake/include
```

Where it actually should be
```
<site-packages>/executorch/include
```

Fixing this issue. Verified it on [build_torchao_ops.sh](https://github.com/pytorch/ao/blob/main/torchao/experimental/build_torchao_ops.sh)

Pull Request resolved: #6102

Reviewed By: lucylq

Differential Revision: D64189337

Pulled By: larryliu0820

fbshipit-source-id: 13033587f5499537623995b8f9457fb47d780340

* New Runtime pybind API (#6063)

Summary:
Based on this proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10Q4-pt97inQQtFf-FjjwhMaDXXCfk1zGy6V6EkygNUY/edit#heading=h.fcrpnrtb6cud

Historically our pybinding APIs are not following the same C++ modeling
(Program, Method etc) and hence it's hard to use and easy to hit
footguns - for example, if we load the program and return it from a
python method, it goes out of the scope and releases the memory.

This effort is to create Pybind APIs that resembles C++ objects so it's
less confusing to the users.

Add the following python classes:
* `Runtime`: a singleton object hosting methods like `load_program`.
  Returns a `Program` object when calling `load_program`. Also exposes
  the operator registry
* `Program`: each pte file should have one `Program` object. Most
  important method is `load_method` which returns a `Method` object. It
  has a property `method_names` where we can inspect what methods are
  inside this .pte file.
* `Method`: one object per method name in a given `Program`. Exposes
  `execute` which takes in pytree flattened torch tensors as input and
  return pytree flattened output. It also exposes `MethodMeta` for users
  to inspect more information regarding input/output of this method.

Pull Request resolved: #6063

Reviewed By: dbort

Differential Revision: D64132360

Pulled By: larryliu0820

fbshipit-source-id: a2f35edc5fd8c200df0812a693e454d66d6a907e

* Lint

* Fix test_pybindings.py

---------

Co-authored-by: Riley Dulin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants