-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 607
Take advantage of C++17 in scalar_type_util.h #6968
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/6968
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❗ 1 Active SEVsThere are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below: ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 0e992c6 with merge base 43555d2 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) ghstack-source-id: 254388438 Pull Request resolved: #6968
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D66181946 |
I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #6968 I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) ghstack-source-id: 254409669
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D66181946 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving optimistically, but please make sure CI jobs run properly after the SEV is mitigated
I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #6968 I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. ghstack-source-id: 254479808 Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/)
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D66181946 |
I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #6968 I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. ghstack-source-id: 254597889 Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/)
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D66181946 |
I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #6968 I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. ghstack-source-id: 254600078 Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/)
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D66181946 |
I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #6968 I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. ghstack-source-id: 254805946 Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/)
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D66181946 |
Pull Request resolved: #6968 I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17. ghstack-source-id: 254805946 Differential Revision: [D66181946](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66181946/) Co-authored-by: Scott Wolchok <[email protected]>
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
I generated a big ugly table because we couldn't make promoteTypes constexpr before we had C++17. Now we have C++17.
Differential Revision: D66181946