Skip to content

removed unnecessary datasink checks #9211

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2025

Conversation

Gasoonjia
Copy link
Contributor

Differential Revision: D71081481

@Gasoonjia Gasoonjia requested a review from tarun292 as a code owner March 12, 2025 23:44
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9211

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit ef57c18 with merge base 7901539 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Mar 12, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71081481

Gasoonjia added a commit to Gasoonjia/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2025
Summary:

This diff removes unnecessary datasink checks in etdump to avoid false alarm when user dumping debug data.

Differential Revision: D71081481
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71081481

Gasoonjia added a commit to Gasoonjia/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
Summary:

This diff removes unnecessary datasink checks in etdump to avoid false alarm when user dumping debug data.

Reviewed By: Jack-Khuu

Differential Revision: D71081481
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71081481

@Gasoonjia
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

Gasoonjia added a commit to Gasoonjia/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
Summary:

This diff removes unnecessary datasink checks in etdump to avoid false alarm when user dumping debug data.

Reviewed By: Jack-Khuu

Differential Revision: D71081481
Gasoonjia added a commit to Gasoonjia/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
Summary:

This diff removes unnecessary datasink checks in etdump to avoid false alarm when user dumping debug data.

Reviewed By: Jack-Khuu

Differential Revision: D71081481
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71081481

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71081481

Gasoonjia added a commit to Gasoonjia/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#9211

This diff removes unnecessary datasink checks in etdump to avoid false alarm when user dumping debug data.

Reviewed By: Jack-Khuu

Differential Revision: D71081481
Summary:

This diff removes unnecessary datasink checks in etdump to avoid false alarm when user dumping debug data.

Reviewed By: Jack-Khuu

Differential Revision: D71081481
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71081481

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit b0c2c7c into pytorch:main Mar 14, 2025
79 of 82 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants