Skip to content

Cargo: Use v2 resolver #3893

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2021
Merged

Cargo: Use v2 resolver #3893

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2021

Conversation

Turbo87
Copy link
Member

@Turbo87 Turbo87 commented Sep 6, 2021

see https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/features.html#feature-resolver-version-2

It doesn't make a difference for us right now, but I guess we should move to the new resolver instead of staying behind on the old one for no reason :)

@Turbo87 Turbo87 added C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear A-backend ⚙️ labels Sep 6, 2021
Copy link
Member

@0xPoe 0xPoe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to modify the s3's Cargo.toml?

@Turbo87
Copy link
Member Author

Turbo87 commented Sep 7, 2021

@hi-rustin good point. I've added it there too.

@0xPoe
Copy link
Member

0xPoe commented Sep 8, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 8, 2021

📌 Commit 21b563e has been approved by hi-rustin

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 8, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 21b563e with merge 8123309...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 8, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: hi-rustin
Pushing 8123309 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 8123309 into rust-lang:master Sep 8, 2021
@Turbo87 Turbo87 deleted the resolver branch September 8, 2021 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-backend ⚙️ C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants