Merging r308808, r308813 and r308906:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r308808 | arsenm | 2017-07-21 16:56:13 -0700 (Fri, 21 Jul 2017) | 6 lines

RA: Remove assert on empty live intervals

This is possible if there is an undef use when
splitting the vreg during spilling.

Fixes bug 33620.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r308813 | arsenm | 2017-07-21 17:24:01 -0700 (Fri, 21 Jul 2017) | 6 lines

RA: Remove another assert on empty intervals

This case is similar to the one fixed in r308808,
except when rematerializing.

Fixes bug 33884.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r308906 | arsenm | 2017-07-24 11:07:55 -0700 (Mon, 24 Jul 2017) | 6 lines

RA: Replace asserts related to empty live intervals

These don't exactly assert the same thing anymore, and
allow empty live intervals with non-empty uses.

Removed in r308808 and r308813.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_50@309171 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

Author: zmodem

lib/CodeGen/InlineSpiller.cpp

@@ -643,8 +643,11 @@ void InlineSpiller::reMaterializeAll() {
       Edit->eraseVirtReg(Reg);
       continue;
     }
-    assert((LIS.hasInterval(Reg) && !LIS.getInterval(Reg).empty()) &&
-           "Reg with empty interval has reference");
+
+    assert(LIS.hasInterval(Reg) &&
+           (!LIS.getInterval(Reg).empty() || !MRI.reg_nodbg_empty(Reg)) &&
+           "Empty and not used live-range?!");
+
     RegsToSpill[ResultPos++] = Reg;
   }
   RegsToSpill.erase(RegsToSpill.begin() + ResultPos, RegsToSpill.end());

lib/CodeGen/RegAllocBase.cpp

@@ -133,18 +133,19 @@ void RegAllocBase::allocatePhysRegs() {
     if (AvailablePhysReg)
       Matrix->assign(*VirtReg, AvailablePhysReg);
 
-    for (VirtRegVec::iterator I = SplitVRegs.begin(), E = SplitVRegs.end();
-         I != E; ++I) {
-      LiveInterval *SplitVirtReg = &LIS->getInterval(*I);
+    for (unsigned Reg : SplitVRegs) {
+      assert(LIS->hasInterval(Reg));
+
+      LiveInterval *SplitVirtReg = &LIS->getInterval(Reg);
       assert(!VRM->hasPhys(SplitVirtReg->reg) && "Register already assigned");
       if (MRI->reg_nodbg_empty(SplitVirtReg->reg)) {
+        assert(SplitVirtReg->empty() && "Non-empty but used interval");
         DEBUG(dbgs() << "not queueing unused  " << *SplitVirtReg << '\n');
         aboutToRemoveInterval(*SplitVirtReg);
         LIS->removeInterval(SplitVirtReg->reg);
         continue;
       }
       DEBUG(dbgs() << "queuing new interval: " << *SplitVirtReg << "\n");
-      assert(!SplitVirtReg->empty() && "expecting non-empty interval");
       assert(TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(SplitVirtReg->reg) &&
              "expect split value in virtual register");
       enqueue(SplitVirtReg);

test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/spill-empty-live-interval.mir

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa-opencl -verify-machineinstrs -stress-regalloc=1 -start-before=simple-register-coalescing -stop-after=greedy -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+# https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33620
+
+---
+# This would assert due to the empty live interval created for %vreg9
+# on the last S_NOP with an undef subreg use.
+
+# CHECK-LABEL: name: expecting_non_empty_interval
+
+# CHECK: undef %7.sub1 = V_MAC_F32_e32 0, undef %1, undef %7.sub1, implicit %exec
+# CHECK-NEXT: SI_SPILL_V64_SAVE %7, %stack.0, %sgpr0_sgpr1_sgpr2_sgpr3, %sgpr5, 0, implicit %exec :: (store 8 into %stack.0, align 4)
+# CHECK-NEXT: undef %5.sub1 = V_MOV_B32_e32 1786773504, implicit %exec
+# CHECK-NEXT: dead %2 = V_MUL_F32_e32 0, %5.sub1, implicit %exec
+
+# CHECK: S_NOP 0, implicit %6.sub1
+# CHECK-NEXT: %8 = SI_SPILL_V64_RESTORE %stack.0, %sgpr0_sgpr1_sgpr2_sgpr3, %sgpr5, 0, implicit %exec :: (load 8 from %stack.0, align 4)
+# CHECK-NEXT: S_NOP 0, implicit %8.sub1
+# CHECK-NEXT: S_NOP 0, implicit undef %9.sub0
+
+name: expecting_non_empty_interval
+tracksRegLiveness: true
+registers:
+  - { id: 0, class: vreg_64, preferred-register: '' }
+  - { id: 1, class: vgpr_32, preferred-register: '' }
+  - { id: 2, class: vgpr_32, preferred-register: '' }
+  - { id: 3, class: vreg_64, preferred-register: '' }
+body:             |
+  bb.0:
+    successors: %bb.1
+    undef %0.sub1 = V_MAC_F32_e32 0, undef %1, undef %0.sub1, implicit %exec
+    undef %3.sub1 = V_MOV_B32_e32 1786773504, implicit %exec
+    dead %2 = V_MUL_F32_e32 0, %3.sub1, implicit %exec
+
+  bb.1:
+    S_NOP 0, implicit %3.sub1
+    S_NOP 0, implicit %0.sub1
+    S_NOP 0, implicit undef %0.sub0
+    S_ENDPGM
+
+...
+
+# Similar assert which happens when trying to rematerialize.
+# https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33884
+---
+# CHECK-LABEL: name: rematerialize_empty_interval_has_reference
+
+# CHECK-NOT: MOV
+# CHECK: undef %3.sub2 = V_MOV_B32_e32 1786773504, implicit %exec
+
+# CHECK: bb.1:
+# CHECK-NEXT: S_NOP 0, implicit %3.sub2
+# CHECK-NEXT: S_NOP 0, implicit undef %6.sub0
+# CHECK-NEXT: undef %4.sub2 = V_MOV_B32_e32 0, implicit %exec
+# CHECK-NEXT: S_NOP 0, implicit %4.sub2
+name: rematerialize_empty_interval_has_reference
+tracksRegLiveness: true
+registers:
+  - { id: 0, class: vreg_128, preferred-register: '' }
+  - { id: 1, class: vgpr_32, preferred-register: '' }
+  - { id: 2, class: vgpr_32, preferred-register: '' }
+  - { id: 3, class: vreg_128, preferred-register: '' }
+body:             |
+  bb.0:
+    successors: %bb.1
+
+    undef %0.sub2 = V_MOV_B32_e32 0, implicit %exec
+    undef %3.sub2 = V_MOV_B32_e32 1786773504, implicit %exec
+
+  bb.1:
+    S_NOP 0, implicit %3.sub2
+    S_NOP 0, implicit undef %0.sub0
+    S_NOP 0, implicit %0.sub2
+
+...