Skip to content

Improve wording of manual_contains docs #14917

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4439,7 +4439,7 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
/// Checks for usage of `iter().any()` on slices when it can be replaced with `contains()` and suggests doing so.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// `contains()` is more concise and idiomatic, sometimes more fast.
/// `contains()` is more concise and idiomatic, while also being faster in some cases.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```no_run
Expand Down