---

yaml
---
r: 38493
b: refs/heads/incoming
c: 860573e
h: refs/heads/master
i:
  38491: 31e6cc8
v: v3

Author: graydon

[refs]

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ refs/heads/try: 3d5418789064fdb463e872a4e651af1c628a3650
 refs/tags/release-0.1: 1f5c5126e96c79d22cb7862f75304136e204f105
 refs/heads/ndm: f3868061cd7988080c30d6d5bf352a5a5fe2460b
 refs/heads/try2: a810c03263670238bccd64cabb12a23a46e3a278
-refs/heads/incoming: 012bb7de5ba65bfd7b3483595e65a4cda1d1f682
+refs/heads/incoming: 860573e3e00b5a807021b8c7a94a9672de4fa687
 refs/heads/dist-snap: 22efa39382d41b084fde1719df7ae8ce5697d8c9
 refs/tags/release-0.2: c870d2dffb391e14efb05aa27898f1f6333a9596
 refs/tags/release-0.3: b5f0d0f648d9a6153664837026ba1be43d3e2503

branches/incoming/doc/rust.md

@@ -936,11 +936,13 @@ fn f(i: int) -> int {
 }
 ~~~~
 
-The typechecker would complain that `f` doesn't return a value in the
-`else` branch. Adding the `!` annotation on `my_err` would
-express that `f` requires no explicit `return`, as if it returns
-control to the caller, it returns a value (true because it never returns
-control).
+This will not compile without the `!` annotation on `my_err`,
+since the `else` branch of the conditional in `f` does not return an `int`,
+as required by the signature of `f`.
+Adding the `!` annotation to `my_err` informs the typechecker that,
+should control ever enter `my_err`, no further type judgments about `f` need to hold,
+since control will never resume in any context that relies on those judgments.
+Thus the return type on `f` only needs to reflect the `if` branch of the conditional.
 
 #### Pure functions