|
1 | 1 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
2 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17 |
| 2 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17 |
3 | 3 | |
|
4 | 4 | LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
5 | 5 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
|
6 | 6 | |
|
7 | 7 | = note: `-D clippy::get-unwrap` implied by `-D warnings`
|
8 | 8 |
|
9 | 9 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
10 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17 |
| 10 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17 |
11 | 11 | |
|
12 | 12 | LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
|
13 | 13 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`
|
14 | 14 |
|
15 | 15 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
16 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17 |
| 16 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:17 |
17 | 17 | |
|
18 | 18 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
|
19 | 19 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`
|
20 | 20 |
|
21 | 21 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
22 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:17 |
| 22 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45:17 |
23 | 23 | |
|
24 | 24 | LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
|
25 | 25 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
|
26 | 26 |
|
27 | 27 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
28 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45:17 |
| 28 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:46:17 |
29 | 29 | |
|
30 | 30 | LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
31 | 31 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
|
32 | 32 |
|
33 | 33 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
34 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:46:17 |
| 34 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:17 |
35 | 35 | |
|
36 | 36 | LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
37 | 37 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
|
38 | 38 |
|
| 39 | +error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| 40 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:21 |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | +LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); |
| 43 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]` |
| 44 | + |
39 | 45 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
40 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:10 |
| 46 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:9 |
41 | 47 | |
|
42 | 48 | LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
43 |
| - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut boxed_slice[0]` |
| 49 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]` |
44 | 50 |
|
45 | 51 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
46 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53:10 |
| 52 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:56:9 |
47 | 53 | |
|
48 | 54 | LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
49 |
| - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_slice[0]` |
| 55 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]` |
50 | 56 |
|
51 | 57 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
52 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:10 |
| 58 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:57:9 |
53 | 59 | |
|
54 | 60 | LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
55 |
| - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vec[0]` |
| 61 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]` |
56 | 62 |
|
57 | 63 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
58 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:10 |
| 64 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:58:9 |
59 | 65 | |
|
60 | 66 | LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
61 |
| - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vecdeque[0]` |
| 67 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]` |
62 | 68 |
|
63 | 69 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
64 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:64:17 |
| 70 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:67:17 |
65 | 71 | |
|
66 | 72 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
67 | 73 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
|
68 | 74 |
|
69 | 75 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
70 |
| - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:65:17 |
| 76 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:68:17 |
71 | 77 | |
|
72 | 78 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
73 | 79 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
|
74 | 80 |
|
75 |
| -error: aborting due to 12 previous errors |
| 81 | +error: aborting due to 13 previous errors |
76 | 82 |
|
0 commit comments