File tree Expand file tree Collapse file tree 2 files changed +9
-4
lines changed
branches/stable/src/doc/tarpl Expand file tree Collapse file tree 2 files changed +9
-4
lines changed Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ refs/heads/tmp: afae2ff723393b3ab4ccffef6ac7c6d1809e2da0
29
29
refs/tags/1.0.0-alpha.2: 4c705f6bc559886632d3871b04f58aab093bfa2f
30
30
refs/tags/homu-tmp: f859507de8c410b648d934d8f5ec1c52daac971d
31
31
refs/tags/1.0.0-beta: 8cbb92b53468ee2b0c2d3eeb8567005953d40828
32
- refs/heads/stable: 5f6e0abe27aa6632f95492ad8864d8084c1bacef
32
+ refs/heads/stable: 99043dde9dd2d0507ad2e3cda65b9d3e9244f13f
33
33
refs/tags/1.0.0: 55bd4f8ff2b323f317ae89e254ce87162d52a375
34
34
refs/tags/1.1.0: bc3c16f09287e5545c1d3f76b7abd54f2eca868b
35
35
refs/tags/1.2.0: f557861f822c34f07270347b94b5280de20a597e
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -95,10 +95,9 @@ actually possible to communicate this at the type level by returning a
95
95
knowing that it's * statically impossible* for this value to be an ` Err ` , as
96
96
this would require providing a value of type Void.
97
97
98
- In principle, Rust can do some interesting analysees and optimizations based
98
+ In principle, Rust can do some interesting analyses and optimizations based
99
99
on this fact. For instance, ` Result<T, Void> ` could be represented as just ` T ` ,
100
- because the Err case doesn't actually exist. Also in principle the following
101
- could compile:
100
+ because the Err case doesn't actually exist. The following * could* also compile:
102
101
103
102
``` rust,ignore
104
103
enum Void {}
@@ -111,3 +110,9 @@ let Ok(num) = res;
111
110
112
111
But neither of these tricks work today, so all Void types get you today is
113
112
the ability to be confident that certain situations are statically impossible.
113
+
114
+ One final subtle detail about empty types is that raw pointers to them are
115
+ actually valid to construct, but dereferencing them is Undefined Behaviour
116
+ because that doesn't actually make sense. That is, you could model C's ` void * `
117
+ type with ` *const Void ` , but this doesn't necessarily gain anything over using
118
+ e.g. ` *const () ` , which * is* safe to randomly dereference.
You can’t perform that action at this time.
0 commit comments