---

yaml
---
r: 174223
b: refs/heads/batch
c: 0109cea
h: refs/heads/master
i:
  174221: ae20eff
  174219: 71b681a
  174215: 8584478
  174207: 4f66970
v: v3

Author: Ms2ger

[refs]

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ refs/tags/0.12.0: f0c419429ef30723ceaf6b42f9b5a2aeb5d2e2d1
 refs/heads/issue-18208-method-dispatch-2: 9e1eae4fb9b6527315b4441cf8a0f5ca911d1671
 refs/heads/automation-fail: 1bf06495443584539b958873e04cc2f864ab10e4
 refs/heads/issue-18208-method-dispatch-3-quick-reject: 2009f85b9f99dedcec4404418eda9ddba90258a2
-refs/heads/batch: f979f91ae20b2da9b2414033460985d5e023fbc5
+refs/heads/batch: 0109ceaf827461d525ada1a71dcba909071d7cdc
 refs/heads/building: 126db549b038c84269a1e4fe46f051b2c15d6970
 refs/heads/beta: 44a287e6eb22ec3c2a687fc156813577464017f7
 refs/heads/windistfix: 7608dbad651f02e837ed05eef3d74a6662a6e928

branches/batch/src/doc/trpl/functions.md

@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ fn foo(x: i32) -> i32 {
 ```
 
 The previous definition without `return` may look a bit strange if you haven't
-worked in an expression-based language before, but it becomes intutive over
+worked in an expression-based language before, but it becomes intuitive over
 time. If this were production code, we wouldn't write it in that way anyway,
 we'd write this: