Defect: --wrapping option is not accepted

[LaHaine]

Avg response time
![Issue Stats][issue stat img]

Please replace [ ] with [X] to indicate you have taken the requested action

Defect/bug report

This is with opencoarrays 1.8.5. The wrapper script caf lists the options if called without any arguments:

caf - Fortran compiler wrapper for OpenCoarrays

 Usage: caf <fortran-source-file> [options] ...

 Options:
   --help, -h               Show this help message
   --version, -v, -V        Report version and copyright information
   --wrapping, -w, --wraps  Report the name of the wrapped compiler
[…]

The option --wrapping does not work, but -w does:

# caf --wrapping
gfortran: error: unrecognized command line option ‘--wrapping’; did you mean ‘--graphite’?
# caf -w
caf wraps CAFC=/opt/ohpc/pub/mpi/openmpi-gnu/1.10.6/bin/mpif90

I propose to either remove the --wrapping option or make it work like -w.

• I have searched the [issues page] and [mailing list] and did
  not find any issue matching the one I would like to report
• I have included a succinct description of the problem,
  including the steps necessary to reproduce it
• I have included which version of OpenCoarrays I am working
  with, or the output of git describe if working with a cloned
  repository rather than an [official release]
  1.8.5
• I have included the MPI library name and version I am using
  with OpenCoarrays
  • name: [Open-MPI] version:1.10.6
• I have included the Fortran compiler name and version that I am
  using with OpenCoarrays: gfortran 6.2.1
• I have included the output of uname -a
  Linux pax11.zeuthen.desy.de 3.10.0-514.6.1.el7.x86_64 tests dis_transpose: test passed  #1 SMP Tue Jan 17 11:12:41 CST 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
• I have included the Operating system name and version,
  including linux distro: Scientific Linux 7.3
• I have included the machine name if I am allowed to do so and
  wish to seek help debugging on that particular system (Titan,
  Pleiades, Excalibur, Lightening, Mira, etc.)

[zbeekman]

Oh I see now... the help doesn't match the implementation