Skip to content

Renaming of CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration breaks code that was excluding it or referring to it from @AutoConfigureBefore/After #23724

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
philwebb opened this issue Oct 16, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Renaming of CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration breaks code that was excluding it or referring to it from @AutoConfigureBefore/After #23724

philwebb opened this issue Oct 16, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@wilkinsona
Labels
type: bug A general bug
Milestone
2.4.0-RC1

Comments

@philwebb
Copy link
Member

See #22988 (comment)

Unless we can find a way to support renaming auto-configuration classes, this one should be reverted.
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 2.4.x milestone Oct 16, 2020
@philwebb philwebb added the type: enhancement A general enhancement label Oct 16, 2020
@philwebb philwebb changed the title Rever ' Rename CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration' Revert ' Rename CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration' Oct 16, 2020
@philwebb philwebb added type: bug A general bug and removed type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Oct 16, 2020
@wilkinsona wilkinsona changed the title Revert ' Rename CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration' Renaming of CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration breaks code that was excluding it or referring to it from @AutoConfigureBefore/After Oct 16, 2020
@wilkinsona wilkinsona self-assigned this Oct 16, 2020
@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 2.4.x, 2.4.0-RC1 Oct 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wilkinsona wilkinsona

Labels
type: bug A general bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.4.0-RC1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@philwebb @wilkinsona