[EarlyCSE] Fix and recommit the revised c982682

In addition to calculate hash consistently by swapping SELECT's
operands, we also need to inverse the select pattern favor to match the
original logic.

[EarlyCSE] Equivalent SELECTs should hash equally

DenseMap<SimpleValue> assumes that, if its isEqual method returns true
for two elements, then its getHashValue method must return the same value
for them. This invariant is broken when one SELECT node is a min/max
operation, and the other can be transformed into an equivalent min/max by
inverting its predicate and swapping its operands. This patch fixes an
assertion failure that would occur intermittently while compiling the
following IR:

    define i32 @t(i32 %i) {
      %cmp = icmp sle i32 0, %i
      %twin1 = select i1 %cmp, i32 %i, i32 0
      %cmpinv = icmp sgt i32 0, %i
      %twin2 = select i1 %cmpinv,  i32 0, i32 %i
      %sink = add i32 %twin1, %twin2
      ret i32 %sink
    }

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86843

Author: darkbuck

llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/EarlyCSE.cpp

@@ -191,11 +191,26 @@ static bool matchSelectWithOptionalNotCond(Value *V, Value *&Cond, Value *&A,
     Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
   }
 
+  // Check for inverted variants of min/max by swapping operands.
+  bool Inversed = false;
   switch (Pred) {
-  case CmpInst::ICMP_UGT: Flavor = SPF_UMAX; break;
-  case CmpInst::ICMP_ULT: Flavor = SPF_UMIN; break;
-  case CmpInst::ICMP_SGT: Flavor = SPF_SMAX; break;
-  case CmpInst::ICMP_SLT: Flavor = SPF_SMIN; break;
+  case CmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
+  case CmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
+  case CmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
+  case CmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
+    Pred = CmpInst::getInversePredicate(Pred);
+    std::swap(A, B);
+    Inversed = true;
+    break;
+  default:
+    break;
+  }
+
+  switch (Pred) {
+  case CmpInst::ICMP_UGT: Flavor = Inversed ? SPF_UMIN : SPF_UMAX; break;
+  case CmpInst::ICMP_ULT: Flavor = Inversed ? SPF_UMAX : SPF_UMIN; break;
+  case CmpInst::ICMP_SGT: Flavor = Inversed ? SPF_SMIN : SPF_SMAX; break;
+  case CmpInst::ICMP_SLT: Flavor = Inversed ? SPF_SMAX : SPF_SMIN; break;
   default: break;
   }
 

llvm/test/Transforms/EarlyCSE/commute.ll

@@ -684,6 +684,26 @@ define i32 @select_not_invert_pred_cond_wrong_select_op(i8 %x, i8 %y, i32 %t, i3
   ret i32 %r
 }
 
+; This test is a reproducer for a bug involving inverted min/max selects
+; hashing differently but comparing as equal.  It exhibits such a pair of
+; values, and we run this test with -earlycse-debug-hash which would catch
+; the disagreement and fail if it regressed.
+; EarlyCSE should be able to detect the 2nd redundant `select` and eliminate
+; it.
+define i32 @inverted_max(i32 %i) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @inverted_max(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp sle i32 0, [[I:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[M1:%.*]] = select i1 [[CMP]], i32 [[I]], i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMPINV:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 0, [[I:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = add i32 [[M1]], [[M1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 [[R]]
+  %cmp = icmp sle i32 0, %i
+  %m1 = select i1 %cmp, i32 %i, i32 0
+  %cmpinv = icmp sgt i32 0, %i
+  %m2 = select i1 %cmpinv, i32 0, i32 %i
+  %r = add i32 %m1, %m2
+  ret i32 %r
+}
 
 ; This test is a reproducer for a bug involving inverted min/max selects
 ; hashing differently but comparing as equal.  It exhibits such a pair of