Merge pull request #9922 from felipepiovezan/felipe/cherrypick_unwind_by_asm_plans

[cherry-pick][lldb][swift] Prefer assembly unwind plans for async registers

Author: felipepiovezan

lldb/source/Plugins/LanguageRuntime/Swift/SwiftLanguageRuntime.cpp

@@ -2294,6 +2294,21 @@ static llvm::Expected<addr_t> GetCFA(Process &process, RegisterContext &regctx,
       cfa_loc.GetValueType());
 }
 
+static UnwindPlanSP GetUnwindPlanForAsyncRegister(FuncUnwinders &unwinders,
+                                                  Target &target,
+                                                  Thread &thread) {
+  // We cannot trust compiler emitted unwind plans, as they respect the
+  // swifttail calling convention, which assumes the async register is _not_
+  // restored and therefore it is not tracked by compiler plans. If LLDB uses
+  // those plans, it may take "no info" to mean "register not clobbered". For
+  // those reasons, always favour the assembly plan first, it will try to track
+  // the async register by assuming the usual arm calling conventions.
+  if (UnwindPlanSP asm_plan = unwinders.GetAssemblyUnwindPlan(target, thread))
+    return asm_plan;
+  // In the unlikely case the assembly plan is not available, try all others.
+  return unwinders.GetUnwindPlanAtNonCallSite(target, thread);
+}
+
 /// Attempts to use UnwindPlans that inspect assembly to recover the entry value
 /// of the async context register. This is a simplified version of the methods
 /// in RegisterContextUnwind, since plumbing access to those here would be
@@ -2311,7 +2326,7 @@ static llvm::Expected<addr_t> ReadAsyncContextRegisterFromUnwind(
 
   Target &target = process.GetTarget();
   UnwindPlanSP unwind_plan =
-      unwinders->GetUnwindPlanAtNonCallSite(target, regctx.GetThread());
+      GetUnwindPlanForAsyncRegister(*unwinders, target, regctx.GetThread());
   if (!unwind_plan)
     return llvm::createStringError(
         "SwiftLanguageRuntime: Failed to find non call site unwind plan at "

lldb/test/API/lang/swift/async/unwind/unwind_register_pressure/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+SWIFT_SOURCES := main.swift
+SWIFTFLAGS_EXTRAS := -parse-as-library -Xfrontend -Xllvm -Xfrontend --emit-dwarf-unwind=always
+include Makefile.rules

lldb/test/API/lang/swift/async/unwind/unwind_register_pressure/TestSwiftAsyncUnwindRegisterPressure.py

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+import lldbsuite.test.lldbtest as lldbtest
+import lldbsuite.test.lldbutil as lldbutil
+
+
+# This test is a best effort attempt at creating a program with high register
+# pressure while also making the linker avoid compact unwind.
+class TestCase(lldbtest.TestBase):
+
+    mydir = lldbtest.TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
+
+    def set_breakpoints_all_instructions(self, target):
+        funclet_name = "$s1a12ASYNC___1___SiyYaFTY0_"
+        breakpoints = set()
+
+        sym_ctx_list = target.FindFunctions(funclet_name)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            sym_ctx_list.GetSize(),
+            1,
+            f"failed to get symbol context for {funclet_name}",
+        )
+        function = sym_ctx_list[0].function
+
+        instructions = list(function.GetInstructions(target))
+        self.assertGreater(len(instructions), 0)
+        for instruction in instructions:
+            bp = target.BreakpointCreateBySBAddress(instruction.GetAddress())
+            self.assertTrue(
+                bp.IsValid(), f"failed to set bp inside funclet {funclet_name}"
+            )
+            breakpoints.add(bp.GetID())
+        return breakpoints
+
+    def check_unwind_ok(self, thread):
+        # Check that we see the virtual backtrace:
+        expected_funcnames = [
+            "ASYNC___1___",
+            "ASYNC___2___",
+            "ASYNC___3___",
+            "ASYNC___4___",
+            "ASYNC___5___",
+        ]
+        frames = thread.frames
+        self.assertGreater(
+            len(frames), len(expected_funcnames), f"Invalid backtrace for {frames}"
+        )
+        actual_funcnames = [
+            frame.GetFunctionName() for frame in frames[: len(expected_funcnames)]
+        ]
+        for expected_name, actual_name in zip(expected_funcnames, actual_funcnames):
+            self.assertIn(expected_name, actual_name, f"Unexpected backtrace: {frames}")
+
+    @swiftTest
+    @skipIf(oslist=["windows", "linux"])
+    def test(self):
+        """Test that the debugger can unwind at all instructions of all funclets"""
+        self.build()
+
+        source_file = lldb.SBFileSpec("main.swift")
+        target, process, _, bp = lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
+            self, "BREAK HERE", source_file
+        )
+        target.DeleteAllBreakpoints()
+
+        breakpoints = self.set_breakpoints_all_instructions(target)
+        num_breakpoints = len(breakpoints)
+
+        # Reach most breakpoints and ensure we can unwind in that position.
+        while True:
+            process.Continue()
+            if process.GetState() == lldb.eStateExited:
+                break
+            thread = lldbutil.get_stopped_thread(process, lldb.eStopReasonBreakpoint)
+            self.assertTrue(thread.IsValid())
+            bpid = thread.GetStopReasonDataAtIndex(0)
+            breakpoints.remove(bpid)
+            target.FindBreakpointByID(bpid).SetEnabled(False)
+
+            self.check_unwind_ok(thread)
+
+        # We will never hit all breakpoints we set, because of things like
+        # overflow handling or other unreachable traps. However, it's good to
+        # have some sanity check that we have hit at least a decent chunk of
+        # them.
+        breakpoints_not_hit = len(breakpoints)
+        self.assertLess(breakpoints_not_hit / num_breakpoints, 0.25)

lldb/test/API/lang/swift/async/unwind/unwind_register_pressure/main.swift

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+func work(_ objects: Any...) {
+  for object in objects {
+    print("Processing object of type: \(type(of: object))")
+  }
+}
+
+func use(_ x: Int, _ y: Int) -> Int {
+    return x &* y &+ x &- y
+}
+
+var arr: [Int] = []
+
+func ASYNC___1___() async -> Int {
+  var a1 = 1, a2 = 2, a3 = 3, a4 = 4, a5 = 5
+  print("BREAK HERE")
+  var a6 = 6, a7 = 7, a8 = 8, a9 = 9, a10 = 10
+  var a11 = 11, a12 = 12, a13 = 13, a14 = 14, a15 = 15
+  var a16 = 16, a17 = 17, a18 = 18, a19 = 19, a20 = 20
+  var a21 = 21, a22 = 22, a23 = 23, a24 = 24, a25 = 25
+  var a26 = 26, a27 = 27, a28 = 28, a29 = 29, a30 = 30
+  a1 = use(a1, a2) 
+  a3 = use(a3, a4)
+  a5 = use(a5, a6)
+  a7 = use(a7, a8)
+  a9 = use(a9, a10)
+  a11 = use(a11, a12)
+  a13 = use(a13, a14)
+  a15 = use(a15, a16)
+  a17 = use(a17, a18)
+  a19 = use(a19, a20)
+  a21 = use(a21, a22)
+  a23 = use(a23, a24)
+  a25 = use(a25, a26)
+  a27 = use(a27, a28)
+  a29 = use(a29, a30)
+  work(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15, a16, a17, a18, a19, a20, a21, a22, a23, a24,a25, a26,a27, a28, a29, a30)
+  arr = [a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15, a16, a17, a18, a19, a20, a21, a22, a23, a24,a25, a26,a27, a28, a29, a30]
+  return a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9 + a10 + a11 + a12 + a13 + a14 + a15 + a16 + a17 + a18 + a19
+}
+
+func ASYNC___2___() async -> Int {
+  let result = await ASYNC___1___()
+  return result
+}
+
+func ASYNC___3___() async -> Int {
+  let result = await ASYNC___2___()
+  return result
+}
+
+func ASYNC___4___() async -> Int {
+  let result = await ASYNC___3___()
+  return result
+}
+
+func ASYNC___5___() async -> Int {
+  let result = await ASYNC___4___()
+  return result
+}
+
+@main struct Main {
+  static func main() async {
+    let result = await ASYNC___5___()
+    print(result)
+  }
+}