Skip to content

Commit f715ff4

Browse files
authored
[JITLink] [test] Generalize UNSUPPORTED markings for Windows/arm64 (llvm#142377)
Don't needlessly specify the vendor field as "pc"; in MinGW configurations, the vendor field is often "w64".
1 parent 9b282af commit f715ff4

File tree

3 files changed

+3
-3
lines changed

3 files changed

+3
-3
lines changed

llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/Generic/all-load-multifile-archive-with-duplicate-member-filenames.test

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
# RUN: | FileCheck %s
99
#
1010
# FIXME: Enable this test on Windows/arm64 once that backend is available.
11-
# UNSUPPORTED: target=aarch64-pc-windows-{{.*}}
11+
# UNSUPPORTED: target=aarch64-{{.*}}-windows-{{.*}}
1212
#
1313
# On MinGW targets, when compiling the main() function, it gets
1414
# an implicitly generated call to __main(), which is missing in

llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/Generic/all-load-multifile-archive.test

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
77
# RUN: | FileCheck %s
88
#
99
# FIXME: Enable this test on Windows/arm64 once that backend is available.
10-
# UNSUPPORTED: target=aarch64-pc-windows-{{.*}}
10+
# UNSUPPORTED: target=aarch64-{{.*}}-windows-{{.*}}
1111
#
1212
# On MinGW targets, when compiling the main() function, it gets
1313
# an implicitly generated call to __main(), which is missing in

llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/Generic/sectcreate.test

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
66
# Use -sectcreate to create a section from a data file.
77

88
# Jitlink does not support ARM64 COFF files.
9-
# UNSUPPORTED: target=aarch64-pc-windows-{{.*}}
9+
# UNSUPPORTED: target=aarch64-{{.*}}-windows-{{.*}}
1010

1111
# On MinGW targets, when compiling the main() function, it gets
1212
# an implicitly generated call to __main(), which is missing in

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)