Skip to content

Fix Darwin 'constinit thread_local' variables. #1412

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2020

Conversation

ahatanaka
Copy link

Unlike other platforms using ItaniumCXXABI, Darwin does not allow the
creation of a thread-wrapper function for a variable in the TU of
users. Because of this, it can set the linkage of the thread-local
symbol to internal, with the assumption that no TUs other than the one
defining the variable will need it.

However, constinit thread_local variables do not require the use of
the thread-wrapper call, so users reference the variable
directly. Thus, it must not be converted to internal, or users will
get a link failure.

This was a regression introduced by the optimization in
0022382.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80417

(cherry picked from commit aca3d06)

Unlike other platforms using ItaniumCXXABI, Darwin does not allow the
creation of a thread-wrapper function for a variable in the TU of
users. Because of this, it can set the linkage of the thread-local
symbol to internal, with the assumption that no TUs other than the one
defining the variable will need it.

However, constinit thread_local variables do not require the use of
the thread-wrapper call, so users reference the variable
directly. Thus, it must not be converted to internal, or users will
get a link failure.

This was a regression introduced by the optimization in
0022382.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80417

(cherry picked from commit aca3d06)
@ahatanaka
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test macOS

@ahatanaka ahatanaka merged commit ddae8bc into apple/stable/20200108 Jul 3, 2020
@ahatanaka ahatanaka deleted the PR-64909619 branch July 3, 2020 00:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants