Skip to content

Rsundahl/docweakswift5.9 #6699

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 23, 2023
Merged

Conversation

rsundahl
Copy link

No description provided.

Roy Sundahl and others added 3 commits April 21, 2023 08:31
Explain in the release notes that the Darwin dynamic linker (dyld) requires
that at least one weak symbol be present in any mach-o file that defines an
intended override of a sanitizer dylib weak reference.

rdar://103453678

Reviewed By: thetruestblue

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146745

(cherry picked from commit f1c5c84)
…in. (NFC)

Presenting more than one way to satisfy the single-weak-ref requirement leads to
confusing messaging for the end user. Use the introduction of a single unused
weak variable as the preferred solution. This differential modifies D146745.

rdar://103453678

Reviewed By: yln, thetruestblue

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147526

(cherry picked from commit 5f17ba1)
This addresses issues found by:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/33698

(cherry picked from commit ceacb32)
@rsundahl rsundahl self-assigned this Apr 21, 2023
@rsundahl
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci Please test

@rsundahl rsundahl merged commit 892a7b4 into swift/release/5.9 Apr 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants