SILCombine: fix wrong placement of a strong_release of a dead closure argument which caused a memory leak

The code to find the release-points didn't handle release_value instructions.

https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-9518
rdar://problem/46794455

Author: eeckstein

lib/SILOptimizer/Analysis/ARCAnalysis.cpp

@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ bool swift::getFinalReleasesForValue(SILValue V, ReleaseTracker &Tracker) {
 
     // Try to speed up the trivial case of single release/dealloc.
     if (isa<StrongReleaseInst>(User) || isa<DeallocBoxInst>(User) ||
-        isa<DestroyValueInst>(User)) {
+        isa<DestroyValueInst>(User) || isa<ReleaseValueInst>(User)) {
       if (!seenRelease)
         OneRelease = User;
       else

test/SILOptimizer/sil_combine.sil

@@ -614,6 +614,30 @@ bb0(%0 : $Builtin.RawPointer):
   return %2 : $Builtin.RawPointer
 }
 
+sil @test_closure : $@convention(thin) (@guaranteed C) -> ()
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: sil @dead_closure_elimination
+// CHECK:      bb0(%0 : $C):
+// CHECK-NEXT:   cond_br
+// CHECK-NOT:  strong_release
+// CHECK:      bb2:
+// CHECK-NEXT:   strong_release %0
+// CHECK         return
+sil @dead_closure_elimination : $@convention(thin) (@owned C) -> () {
+bb0(%0 : $C):
+  %1 = function_ref @test_closure : $@convention(thin) (@guaranteed C) -> ()
+  %2 = partial_apply [callee_guaranteed] %1(%0) : $@convention(thin) (@guaranteed C) -> ()
+  cond_br undef, bb1, bb2
+bb1:
+  strong_retain %2 : $@callee_guaranteed () -> ()
+  strong_release %2 : $@callee_guaranteed () -> ()
+  br bb2
+bb2:
+  release_value %2 : $@callee_guaranteed () -> ()
+  %5 = tuple()
+  return %5 : $()
+}
+
 ////////////////////////////////////////////
 // Load Proj To GEP Load Canonicalization //
 ////////////////////////////////////////////