[sema] Wire up VarDecl parent pointers for case stmt related Var Decls

This is in preparation for fixing issues around SILGenPattern fallthrough
emission and bad rename/edit all in scope of case stmt var decls. Specifically,
I am going to ensure that we can get from any VarDecl in the following to any
other VarDecl:

switch x {
case .a(let v1, let v2), .b(let v1, let v2):
  ...
  fallthrough
case .c(let v1, let v2), .d(let v1, let v2):
  ...
}

This will be done by:

1. Pointing the var decls in .d at the corresponding var decls in .c.
2. Pointing the var decls in .c at the corresponding var decls in .b.
3. Pointing the var decls in .b at the corresponding var decls in .a.
4. Pointing the var decls in .a at the case stmt. Recognizing that we are asking
for the next VarDecl, but have a case stmt, we check if we have a fallthrough
case stmt. If so, follow down the fallthrough case stmts until you find a
fallthrough case stmt that doesn't fallthrough itself and then return the
corresponding var decl in the last case label item in that var decl (in the
above .d).

In a subsequent commit I am going to add case body var decls. The only change as
a result of that is that I will insert them into the VarDecl double linked list
after the last case var decl of each case stmt.

(cherry picked from commit b1a7b48)

Author: gottesmm

include/swift/AST/Decl.h

@@ -4669,19 +4669,32 @@ class VarDecl : public AbstractStorageDecl {
   /// returns null.
   ///
   Pattern *getParentPattern() const;
-  
+
   /// Return the statement that owns the pattern associated with this VarDecl,
   /// if one exists.
+  ///
+  /// NOTE: After parsing and before type checking, all VarDecls from
+  /// CaseLabelItem's Patterns return their CaseStmt. After type checking, we
+  /// will have constructed the CaseLabelItem VarDecl linked list implying this
+  /// will return nullptr. After type checking, if one wishes to find a parent
+  /// pattern of a VarDecl of a CaseStmt, \see getRecursiveParentPatternStmt
+  /// instead.
   Stmt *getParentPatternStmt() const {
     if (!Parent)
       return nullptr;
     return Parent.dyn_cast<Stmt *>();
   }
+
   void setParentPatternStmt(Stmt *s) {
     assert(s);
     Parent = s;
   }
 
+  /// Look for the parent pattern stmt of this var decl, recursively
+  /// looking through var decl pointers and then through any
+  /// fallthroughts.
+  Stmt *getRecursiveParentPatternStmt() const;
+
   /// Returns the var decl that this var decl is an implicit reference to if
   /// such a var decl exists.
   VarDecl *getParentVarDecl() const {
@@ -4697,6 +4710,12 @@ class VarDecl : public AbstractStorageDecl {
     Parent = v;
   }
 
+  /// If this is a VarDecl that does not belong to a CaseLabelItem's pattern,
+  /// return this. Otherwise, this VarDecl must belong to a CaseStmt's
+  /// CaseLabelItem. In that case, return the first case label item of the first
+  /// case stmt in a sequence of case stmts that fallthrough into each other.
+  VarDecl *getCanonicalVarDecl() const;
+
   /// True if the global stored property requires lazy initialization.
   bool isLazilyInitializedGlobal() const;
 

lib/AST/Decl.cpp

@@ -4876,14 +4876,74 @@ SourceRange VarDecl::getTypeSourceRangeForDiagnostics() const {
   return SourceRange();
 }
 
-static bool isVarInPattern(const VarDecl *VD, Pattern *P) {
+static bool isVarInPattern(const VarDecl *vd, Pattern *p) {
   bool foundIt = false;
-  P->forEachVariable([&](VarDecl *FoundFD) {
-    foundIt |= FoundFD == VD;
-  });
+  p->forEachVariable([&](VarDecl *foundFD) { foundIt |= foundFD == vd; });
   return foundIt;
 }
 
+static Optional<std::pair<CaseStmt *, Pattern *>>
+findParentPatternCaseStmtAndPattern(const VarDecl *inputVD) {
+  auto getMatchingPattern = [&](CaseStmt *cs) -> Pattern * {
+    for (auto &item : cs->getMutableCaseLabelItems()) {
+      if (isVarInPattern(inputVD, item.getPattern())) {
+        return item.getPattern();
+      }
+    }
+    return nullptr;
+  };
+
+  // First find our canonical var decl. This is the VarDecl corresponding to the
+  // first case label item of the first case block in the fallthrough chain that
+  // our case block is within. Grab the case stmt associated with that var decl
+  // and start traveling down the fallthrough chain looking for the case
+  // statement that the input VD belongs to by using getMatchingPattern().
+  auto *canonicalVD = inputVD->getCanonicalVarDecl();
+  auto *caseStmt =
+      dyn_cast_or_null<CaseStmt>(canonicalVD->getParentPatternStmt());
+  if (!caseStmt)
+    return None;
+
+  if (auto *p = getMatchingPattern(caseStmt))
+    return std::make_pair(caseStmt, p);
+
+  while ((caseStmt = caseStmt->getFallthroughDest().getPtrOrNull())) {
+    if (auto *p = getMatchingPattern(caseStmt))
+      return std::make_pair(caseStmt, p);
+  }
+
+  return None;
+}
+
+VarDecl *VarDecl::getCanonicalVarDecl() const {
+  // Any var decl without a parent var decl is canonical. This means that before
+  // type checking, all var decls are canonical.
+  auto *cur = const_cast<VarDecl *>(this);
+  auto *vd = cur->getParentVarDecl();
+  if (!vd)
+    return cur;
+
+  while (vd) {
+    cur = vd;
+    vd = vd->getParentVarDecl();
+  }
+
+  return cur;
+}
+
+Stmt *VarDecl::getRecursiveParentPatternStmt() const {
+  // If our parent is already a pattern stmt, just return that.
+  if (auto *stmt = getParentPatternStmt())
+    return stmt;
+
+  // Otherwise, see if we have a parent var decl. If we do not, then return
+  // nullptr. Otherwise, return the case stmt that we found.
+  auto result = findParentPatternCaseStmtAndPattern(this);
+  if (!result.hasValue())
+    return nullptr;
+  return result->first;
+}
+
 /// Return the Pattern involved in initializing this VarDecl.  Recall that the
 /// Pattern may be involved in initializing more than just this one vardecl
 /// though.  For example, if this is a VarDecl for "x", the pattern may be
@@ -4905,25 +4965,35 @@ Pattern *VarDecl::getParentPattern() const {
 
     if (auto *CS = dyn_cast<CatchStmt>(stmt))
       return CS->getErrorPattern();
-    
+
     if (auto *cs = dyn_cast<CaseStmt>(stmt)) {
       // In a case statement, search for the pattern that contains it.  This is
       // a bit silly, because you can't have something like "case x, y:" anyway.
       for (auto items : cs->getCaseLabelItems()) {
         if (isVarInPattern(this, items.getPattern()))
           return items.getPattern();
       }
-    } else if (auto *LCS = dyn_cast<LabeledConditionalStmt>(stmt)) {
+    }
+
+    if (auto *LCS = dyn_cast<LabeledConditionalStmt>(stmt)) {
       for (auto &elt : LCS->getCond())
         if (auto pat = elt.getPatternOrNull())
           if (isVarInPattern(this, pat))
             return pat;
     }
-    
+
     //stmt->dump();
     assert(0 && "Unknown parent pattern statement?");
   }
-  
+
+  // Otherwise, check if we have to walk our case stmt's var decl list to find
+  // the pattern.
+  if (auto caseStmtPatternPair = findParentPatternCaseStmtAndPattern(this)) {
+    return caseStmtPatternPair->second;
+  }
+
+  // Otherwise, this is a case we do not know or understand. Return nullptr to
+  // signal we do not have any information.
   return nullptr;
 }
 

lib/Sema/MiscDiagnostics.cpp

@@ -2623,7 +2623,7 @@ VarDeclUsageChecker::~VarDeclUsageChecker() {
       }
       else {
         bool suggestLet = true;
-        if (auto *stmt = var->getParentPatternStmt()) {
+        if (auto *stmt = var->getRecursiveParentPatternStmt()) {
           // Don't try to suggest 'var' -> 'let' conversion
           // in case of 'for' loop because it's an implicitly
           // immutable context.