[SIMD] Update tests to reflect the SIMD operators in the standard library

Introducing the SIMD operators back into the standard library regresses
one test (SR-139 goes exponential against without the designated types
for operatores feature). Split that part of the test out.

Author: DougGregor

test/Constraints/tuple.swift

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ func gcd_23700031<T>(_ a: T, b: T) {
   var a = a
   var b = b
   (a, b) = (b, a % b)  // expected-error {{binary operator '%' cannot be applied to two 'T' operands}}
-  // expected-note @-1 {{overloads for '%' exist with these partially matching parameter lists: (UInt8, UInt8), (Int8, Int8), (UInt16, UInt16), (Int16, Int16), (UInt32, UInt32), (Int32, Int32), (UInt64, UInt64), (Int64, Int64), (UInt, UInt), (Int, Int)}}
+  // expected-note @-1 {{overloads for '%' exist with these partially matching parameter lists}}
 }
 
 // <rdar://problem/24210190>
@@ -259,4 +259,4 @@ func singleElementTuple() {
   let _ = (label: 123).label // expected-error {{cannot create a single-element tuple with an element label}} {{12-19=}}
   let _ = ((label: 123)) // expected-error {{cannot create a single-element tuple with an element label}} {{13-20=}}
   let _ = ((label: 123)).label // expected-error {{cannot create a single-element tuple with an element label}} {{13-20=}}
-}
+}

test/Sema/complex_expressions.swift

@@ -1,11 +1,5 @@
 // RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift
 
-// SR-139:
-// Infinite recursion parsing bitwise operators
-// Temporarily disable to get SIMD stuff working. Ideally we can reinstate this
-// with Mark's changes.
-// let x = UInt32(0x1FF)&0xFF << 24 | UInt32(0x1FF)&0xFF << 16 | UInt32(0x1FF)&0xFF << 8 | (UInt32(0x1FF)&0xFF);
-
 // SR-838:
 // expression test_seconds() was too complex to be solved in reasonable time
 struct Nano : CustomStringConvertible {

validation-test/Sema/type_checker_perf/slow/sr139.swift

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift
+
+// SR-139:
+// Infinite recursion parsing bitwise operators
+let x = UInt32(0x1FF)&0xFF << 24 | UInt32(0x1FF)&0xFF << 16 | UInt32(0x1FF)&0xFF << 8 | (UInt32(0x1FF)&0xFF);  // expected-error {{reasonable time}}
+