Skip to content

Index interchange #10814

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2017
Merged

Index interchange #10814

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2017

Conversation

dabrahams
Copy link
Contributor

@dabrahams dabrahams commented Jul 7, 2017

Please see #9806 for details and more test results. I failed to merge the changes to swift-corelibs-foundation at the same time as I merged that PR, and it broke on linux. This PR is merely getting the merge done correctly.

@dabrahams dabrahams force-pushed the index-interchange branch from 720b9c9 to bd63bd8 Compare July 7, 2017 19:12
I failed to merge the upstream changes to swift-corelibs-foundation at the same
time as I merged that #9806, and it broke on linux. Going to get it right this
time.
@dabrahams dabrahams force-pushed the index-interchange branch from bd63bd8 to 9159239 Compare July 7, 2017 19:14
@dabrahams
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please test with following pull request:
swiftlang/swift-corelibs-foundation#1096

@swift-ci Please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

swift-ci commented Jul 7, 2017

Build failed
Jenkins build - Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Commit - 720b9c96094f61b720b72ce64310367a3806f4c4
Test requested by - @dabrahams

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

swift-ci commented Jul 7, 2017

Build failed
Jenkins build - Swift Test OS X Platform
Git Commit - 720b9c96094f61b720b72ce64310367a3806f4c4
Test requested by - @dabrahams

@dabrahams dabrahams merged commit 076b2e1 into master Jul 7, 2017
@moiseev moiseev deleted the index-interchange branch July 21, 2017 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants