Remove a wrong assert in the specializer and enable old Collection index functions in stdlib #13456
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In case of partial specialization, the replacement type of a substitution can be generic. I couldn't find a small unit test for this bug fix. But it is tested by compiling the stdlib with the change in Collection.swift. rdar://problem/36033852
|
@swift-ci test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In case of partial specialization, the replacement type of a substitution can be generic.
I couldn't find a small unit test for this bug fix. But it is tested by compiling the stdlib with the change in Collection.swift.
This change also enables the temporarily disabled deprecated Collection index functions, which are needed for source compatibility.
rdar://problem/36033852