Skip to content

[libSyntax] Remove the C++ SyntaxClassifier #18314

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2018

Conversation

ahoppen
Copy link
Member

@ahoppen ahoppen commented Jul 27, 2018

The recommended way forward is to use the SyntaxClassifier on the Swift side that's introduced by #18251.

By removing the C++ SyntaxClassifier, we can also eliminate the -force-libsyntax-based-processing option that was used to bootstrap incremental parsing and would generate the syntax map from a syntax tree.

@ahoppen ahoppen requested review from rintaro and nkcsgexi July 27, 2018 23:18
@ahoppen
Copy link
Member Author

ahoppen commented Jul 27, 2018

@swift-ci Please smoke test

The recommended way forward is to use the SyntaxClassifier on the Swift
side.

By removing the C++ SyntaxClassifier, we can also eliminate the
-force-libsyntax-based-processing option that was used to bootstrap
incremental parsing and would generate the syntax map from a syntax
tree.
@ahoppen ahoppen force-pushed the remove-syntax-classifier branch from 81b655e to 749a13a Compare July 30, 2018 16:26
@ahoppen
Copy link
Member Author

ahoppen commented Jul 30, 2018

@swift-ci Please smoke test

Copy link
Contributor

@nkcsgexi nkcsgexi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ahoppen ahoppen merged commit 3deee08 into swiftlang:master Jul 30, 2018
@ahoppen ahoppen deleted the remove-syntax-classifier branch July 30, 2018 22:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants