Make sure we visit auxiliary declarations for symbol visitation. #64942
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SIL symbol visitation wasn't visiting top-level auxiliary declarations,
which meant that it skipped peer and freestanding macros at module
scope. This would manifest in errors of the form
<symbol> is in the generated IR file, but not in TBD file
Fixes rdar://107426276.
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
rxwei
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2023
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SIL symbol visitation wasn't visiting top-level auxiliary declarations, which meant that it skipped peer and freestanding macros at module scope. This would manifest in errors of the form
Fixes rdar://107426276.